|
Stardust Mission Findings
Override Previous Beliefs
12/20/2006
PRESS RELEASE
Source:
University
of Washington
(Additional comments below)Contrary to a popular scientific
notion, there was enough mixing in the early solar system to
transport material from the sun's sizzling neighborhood and deposit
it in icy deep-space comets. It might have been like a gentle eddy
in a stream or more like an artillery blast, but evidence from the
Stardust mission shows that material from the sun's vicinity
traveled to the edge of the solar system, beyond Pluto, as the
planets were born.
"Many people imagined that comets formed in total isolation from the
rest of the solar system. We have shown that's not true," said
Donald Brownlee, the University of Washington astronomer who is
principal investigator, or lead scientist, for Stardust.
"As the solar system formed 4.6 billion years ago, material moved
from the innermost part to the outermost part. I think of it as the
solar system partially turning itself inside out," said Brownlee,
the lead author among 183 on the primary paper detailing the first
research results from the Stardust mission, published in the Dec. 15
edition of the journal Science.
Brownlee is a coauthor of the other six papers on Stardust results
being published in Science, which also are the subject of a news
conference and scientific presentations at the fall meeting of the
American Geophysical Union in San Francisco.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Stardust mission
was launched in February 1999 and met comet Wild 2 (pronounced Vilt)
beyond the orbit of Mars in January 2004. The comet formed more than
4.5 billion years ago and had remained preserved in the frozen
reaches of the outer solar system until 1974 when a close encounter
with Jupiter shifted the comet's orbit to a path between Mars and
Jupiter. After a 2.88 billion-mile journey, Stardust returned to
Earth last January with a payload of thousands of tiny particles
from Wild 2.
Among the biggest surprises, Brownlee said, was finding material
that formed in the hottest part of the solar system. "If those
materials had gotten any hotter they would have vaporized," he said.
"The most extreme particle was the second one we worked on in my
lab. These types of particles are among the oldest things in the
solar system."
That particle was a calcium-aluminum inclusion, a rare material seen
in some meteorites and the very type of matter that scientists used
as an argument for flying Stardust to less than 150 miles from Wild
2. At that close range, the fast-moving particles could have
seriously damaged the spacecraft, but Brownlee and others felt it
was necessary to take that risk if they were to have a chance to
determine an upper limit of material that formed near the sun that
ended up at the farthest fringes of the solar system.
"Truthfully, we really didn't expect to find anything from the inner
solar system. Instead, it showed up in the second particle we looked
at," he said. The scientists also found magnesium olivine, a primary
component of the green sand found on some Hawaiian beaches and, like
a calcium-aluminum inclusion, one of the first things to form in the
cooling solar nebula.
Brownlee estimates that as much as 10 percent of the material in
comets came from the inner solar system. "That's a real surprise
because the common expectation was that comets would be made of
interstellar dust and ice."
But interstellar dust has a glassy characteristic, he said, while
the particles that formed around stars and are found in comets are
partially crystalline. It was suggested previously that interstellar
dust had been mildly heated to transform its glassy substance into
the crystalline comet contents.
"What we've seen, I believe, is totally incompatible with that
interpretation," Brownlee said. "The particles we've seen have been
heavily heated. Astronomical interpretations will be affected by
that."
Wild 2's characteristics seem to be different from those of comet
Tempel 1, which was closely examined in a mission called Deep
Impact. In that case, a probe crashed into the comet surface and the
properties of the resulting dust were analyzed using the infrared
part of the spectrum. But Brownlee notes that while Tempel 1 was
examined remotely from a distance, Stardust returned actual samples
for scientists to study.
"The comets may be different from each other, or different
observations could simply be a result of the different techniques
used to examine them. It is a challenge for us to understand how
they are different and why," he said.
Besides the UW, other major partners for the $212 million Stardust
project are NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Lockheed Martin Space
Systems, The Boeing Co., Germany's Max-Planck Institute for
Extraterrestrial Physics, NASA Ames Research Center, the University
of Chicago, The Open University in England and NASA's Johnson Space
Center.
Brownlee has noted the irony that the tiny specks of comet dust are
being examined by some of the largest investigative tools, such as
the 2-mile-long Stanford Linear Accelerator. But with more than 150
scientists studying dust from Wild 2, Stardust also is driving the
advance of new technology, including development of the world's
highest-resolution microscope at the Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory.
"We're doing things no one ever imagined we could do, even at the
time we launched the mission," Brownlee said. "We've taken a pinch
of comet dust and are learning incredible things."
_____________________
From our
series, “Stardust”
Shatters Comet Theory:
A surprise—the
particles revealed abundances of minerals that can only be
formed at high temperatures. Mineral inclusions
ranged from anorthite, which is made up of calcium, sodium,
aluminum and silicate, to diopside, made of calcium
magnesium and silicate. Formation of such minerals requires
temperatures of thousands of degrees.
How could that
be? For decades we have been assured that comets accreted
uneventfully from the leftovers of a cold “nebular cloud” in
the outermost regions of the solar system. The theoretical
assumption has been stated as fact repeatedly in popular
scientific media, and its proponents believed it. Indeed,
the implication of a fiery past was so unexpected that an
early sample of dust was thought to be contamination from
the spacecraft.
Also see
Stardust Shatters
Comet Theory (2) and
Stardust Shatters Comet Theory
(3) |
|