|
How to make the brightest supernova ever: Explode,
collapse, repeat
11/27/2007
Press Release
(Additional comments below)
SANTA CRUZ, CA--A supernova observed
last year was so bright--about 100 times as luminous as a typical
supernova--that it challenged the theoretical understanding of what
causes supernovae. But Stan Woosley, professor of astronomy and
astrophysics at the University of California, Santa Cruz, had an
idea that he thought could account for it--an extremely massive star
that undergoes repeated explosions. When Woosley and two colleages
worked out the detailed calculations for their model, the results
matched the observations of the supernova known as SN 2006gy, the
brightest ever recorded.
The researchers describe the model in a paper to be published in the
November 15 issue of the journal Nature. Woosley's coauthors are
Sergei Blinnikov, a visiting researcher at UCSC from the Institute
of Theoretical and Experimental Physics in Moscow, and Alexander
Heger of Los Alamos National Laboratory.
"This was a stupendously bright supernova, and we think we have the
leading model to explain it. It's a new mechanism for making a
supernova, and for doing it again and again in the same star,"
Woosley said. "We usually think of a supernova as the death of a
star, but in this case the same star can blow up half a dozen times.
The first explosion throws off the star's outer shell and produces a
notvery- bright supernova-like display. The second explosion puts
another supernova's worth of energy into a second shell, which
expands at high velocity until it collides with the first shell,
producing an extraordinarily brilliant display.
"The two shells collide out at a distance such that the full kinetic
energy is converted into light, so it is up to 100 times more
luminous than an ordinary supernova," Woosley said. "Usually a
supernova only converts 1 percent of its kinetic energy into light,
because it has to expand so much before the light can escape.
This mechanism requires an extremely massive star, 90 to 130 times
the mass of the Sun, he said. As a star this big nears the end of
its life, the temperature in the core gets so hot that some of the
energy from gamma-ray radiation converts into pairs of electrons and
their anti-matter counterparts, positrons. The result is a
phenomenon called "pair instability," in which conversion of
radiation into electron-positron pairs causes the radiation pressure
to drop, and the star begins to contract rapidly.
"As the core contracts it goes deeper into instability until it
collapses and begins to burn fuel explosively. The star then expands
violently, but not enough to disrupt the whole star," Woosley said.
"For stars between 90 and 130 solar masses, you get pulses. It hits
this instability, violently expands, then radiates and contracts
until it gets hotter and hits the instability again. It keeps going
until it loses enough mass to be stable again.
Stars in this size range are very rare, especially in our own
galaxy. But they may have been more common in the early universe.
"Until recently, we would have said such stars don't exist. But any
mechanism that could explain this event requires a very large mass,"
Woosley said.
Other researchers had suggested pair instability as a possible
mechanism for some supernovae, but the idea of repeated
explosions--called "pulsational pair instability"--is new. According
to Woosley, the new mechanism can yield a wide variety of
explosions.
"You could have anywhere from two to six explosions, and they could
be weak or strong," he said. "A lot of variety is possible, and it
gets even more complicated because what's left behind at the end is
still about 40 solar masses, and it continues to evolve and
eventually makes an iron core and collapses, so you can end up with
a gamma-ray burst. The possibilities are very exciting."
__________________________
See our TPODs
The Supernova
Nobody Saw,
Kepler
Supernova Remnant and
Deep
Space Explosion Baffles Astronomers
|
|