
Artist's impression of a so-called "cataclysmic
variable stellar pair," or "nova."
Novus Ratio
Dec
15, 2010
Stellar explosions might not be
what has commonly been assumed.
On January 6,
2003 the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Solar Mass Ejection Imager (SMEI)
was launched from Vandenberg Air Force
Base onboard the Coriolis satellite. SMEI was designed to detect coronal mass
ejections (CMEs) from the time they leave the Sun until they make earthfall. It
does so by analyzing sunlight
Thomson-scattered from heliospheric
electrons.
According to a
recent
press release, since the SMEI views the
entire sky every 102 minutes, and starlight must be subtracted from their
datasets, the research team constantly makes detailed maps of stellar
brightness. While visiting the University of San Diego, Rebekah Hounsell, a
graduate student at Liverpool John Moores University in the U.K. identified four
stars in those maps that fluctuated so rapidly in brightness that they were
classified as "novae," or exploding stars.A nova explosion is
thought to take place when a smaller
white dwarf star in orbit around a
larger companion draws matter onto
its surface. Gravity compresses the
gas and dust until, at a critical
threshold the accreted material
reaches fusion temperatures,
whereupon it explodes, sending
pulses of high-frequency light and
powerful shock waves into space.
An important fact uncovered in the
observations by astronomers at the
University of San Diego was the
rapid flickering of three nova
explosions. Observations of stellar
flaring were also noted. The pauses
in brightening that were observed
prompted Mike Bode of Liverpool John
Moores University to remark: “The
reality of this halt as found in all
three of the fast-declining novae
observed is a challenge to detailed
models of the nova outburst."
Why is this brightness variation so
important? Nova explosions are
supposed to be based on
thermonuclear models of behavior, so
there should be no starts and stops
during the events. Nuclear
explosions are not known to pause in
their expansion. So what could be
the cause of these anomalies? Is a
rewrite of theory required?
Binary pairs of stars are common in
the galaxy. More than half of all
stars have one or more companions.
Since stars are remote from one
another, this suggests that
something favors the formation of
multiple stars. One possible
electric mechanism is nova
fissioning. A star's electrical
stress is concentrated on its
surface. If the electrical flux is
too great, the star might split into
two stars. The surface area of two
stars is greater than the surface
area of one, so the new system is
able to accept more electrical
stress.
An electric current in plasma
generates a magnetic field that will
constrict the current flow. As has
been pointed out in previous Picture
of the Day articles, the constricted
channel is known as a Bennett pinch,
or z-pinch. Fluctuations can form
double layers with large potential
voltages between them. Electric
forces in double layers can be much
stronger than what gravity provides,
while z-pinches can cause
intermittent interruptions in
current flow, which would account
for the flickering.
Double layers can accelerate charged
particles. Double layers can
explode, releasing more energy than
is locally present. It is this
effect that is seen in stellar
flares or so-called "novae."
Fissioning to relieve electrical
stress should present some common
characteristics: nova-like
brightening and dimming
("flickering"), a change in the
star's spectral type and surface
chemical composition, the discovery
of a binary companion, and the
appearance of a nebular cloud.
Instead of revising outdated
theories, Electric Universe
proponents would like to see a
complete revision of thinking where
plasma and electric double-layers
are given precedence.
Stephen Smith
|