
Credit:
X-ray (NASA/CXC/SAO/P. Green et al.), Optical
(Carnegie Obs./Magellan/W.Baade
Telescope/J.S.Mulchaey et al.)
Quasars: Massive or Charged?
Aug
19, 2010
Consensus theories of the
cosmos presume that mass is the
fundamental quality with which
to explain phenomena. For
example, quasars are considered
to be massive accretions of
matter into supermassive black
holes at a galaxy’s nucleus.
Because mass attracts mass, astronomers easily imagine that galaxies attract
galaxies and that collisions, mergers, and tidal disruptions are common. Merging
galaxies should massively increase the matter accreting into their nuclear black
holes, and so astronomers expected to see many binary quasars among the
collisions. Until recently, they have been disappointed.However, a new series of
images has found two close quasars in the midst of two close galaxies with
distorted tails (image above). The tails could be nothing other than tidal
disruptions from the merging of the galaxies, and the quasars are therefore
indisputable confirmation of consensus theory. Should anyone have any doubts, a
computer
simulation of merging galaxies has “corroborated this conclusion.” “The
model verifies the merger origin for this binary quasar system,” averred the
model-maker.
Consensus, of course, being a massive merger of opinion, seldom takes notice of
wisps of dissent. But those who read marginalia will spot a few disagreements.
‘To corroborate’ appears to mean ‘to program a computer with the same
assumptions used to interpret observations and to generate features similar to
the observations.’ (But what else can you do with an object that’s so far away
you can’t stick your thumb in the pie to test it as Jack Horner did?) “The model
verifies the merger” is one of those wheels of logic that provides exercise for
astrophysical gerbils.Another comment questions the certainty that “tails…are a sure sign…of an
ongoing galaxy merger.” One can be sure of any belief merely by pumping up one’s
fervency. But a scientific theory should be instead
reliable, which requires alternative theories to be sought out and tested as
well: What else could the phenomenon be under other assumptions? The consensus
theories appear to produce excuses instead of tests. Readers of this site will
likely think of several alternatives that could provide tests for reliability of
the “sure signs.”
The Electric Universe is one of several alternative plasma theories that presume
charge is the fundamental quality with which to explain phenomena. It takes a
hint provided at the end of the press release (first link above) that “the
galaxy disks both appear to be nearly face-on to Earth” and “the X-rays from
Chandra show no signs of absorption by intervening gas or dust.”
In the Electric Universe, quasars
are plasmoids ejected, usually along
the spin axis, from a plasma focus
mechanism in a galaxy’s nucleus. A
face-on disk means that we are
looking ‘down the barrel.’ An
ejected quasar would appear
projected against the galaxy’s core.
It would be interesting to obtain a
spectrum of the tails apart from the
central quasars to see if they have
a lower redshift. If they do, this
would be
another instance of a higher-redshift
quasar in front of a lower-redshift
galaxy.
Of course, the two quasars may
instead be part of a fragmented
ejection (from an active galaxy
outside the field of view) and are
starting to evolve into companion
galaxies. After all, they lie on the
eastern edge of the Virgo Cluster,
where much ejection activity is
occurring.