
Artist's conception of a protoplanetary disc.
Credit: ESO/L. Calçada/M. Kornmesser
Another Donut on a Stick
Jul
19, 2010
The
jet-and-disk formation (donut on a
stick) typical of plasma discharges
has been
discovered around a high-mass
star. It’s another surprise for the
consensus belief; another
confirmation for the Electric
Universe.The consensus
belief is that a “cloud” of gas and
dust will pull itself into a compact
ball with the tiny force of its own
gravity. Random motions will cancel
out as the cloud collapses—else a
net spin would soon generate enough
centrifugal force to cancel out the
collapse. However, in the final
stage, spin somehow appears and sets
the ball rolling, and friction heats
the gas and dust to ignite a
thermonuclear furnace in the ball’s
core. The spin throws the remnants
of the cloud out into a disk, and
the radiation from the furnace
eventually “evaporates” it.
Then astronomers discovered rings
around some balls and long,
threadlike jets from their poles.
These formations were “surprising,”
which is to say that gravity and gas
can’t do that. The discoveries
generated a flurry of ad hoc
speculation that fractured the
coherence of fundamental theory.
Until now, the discoveries were
limited to low-mass stars.
Convention speculated that the
intense radiation of higher-mass
stars would evaporate the cloudy
disk material before disks—now
somehow compacted into rings—could
form.
As discoveries multiplied, they were
explained away with “somehow”
excuses. Often, “magnetism” was
invoked as a synonym for “somehow”
without acknowledging that magnetism
goes with electricity.
Such acknowledgement is long
overdue: plasma phenomena (i.e.,
donut-on-a-stick formations) have
been studied in plasma labs for
decades. A high-energy electric
discharge will generate magnetic
forces many times stronger than
gravity. They pull plasma into
threadlike channels and spin it.
Instabilities compress the plasma
into hot, spinning balls and
generate ring currents around them.
The masses of the balls are a result
of the ring and jet, not the cause:
gravity and light pressure are
irrelevant to the operation of
Heraclitus’s “thunderbolt that
steers the universe.”
Of course, such acknowledgement
would destroy the entirety of the
conventional belief—along with
textbooks, papers, professorships,
grants, research programs, and
reputations that are based on it.
The institution of astronomy as we
know it is not likely to start
talking plasma. Students of the
cosmos who are more interested in
understanding the stars than in
starring in celebrity astronomy
should go into electrical
engineering.
Mel Acheson
|