picture of the day
archive
subject index

Bright rays extend from Mercury's
Kuiper crater. Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins
University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of
Washington
Oct 10, 2008
Kuiper Crater's Rays
The latest images from the MESSENGER mission reveal a
planetary surface similar to Earth's Moon. Are both bodies
the progeny of one electrical parent?
The
MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and
Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft has completed its second
flyby of the planet Mercury on its way to an orbital
insertion in 2011. Features not previously seen in such
detail are found in the latest images. For example, many
craters on
the far side of Mercury, such as Kuiper, are surrounded
by bright linear deposits called "rays." The rays are
reminiscent of those that radiate outward from Tycho, a
giant crater on Earth's Moon.
Tycho and Kuiper are similar in their morphology and in
size. Tycho is approximately 85 kilometers in diameter while
Kuiper measures 65 kilometers. Just like Tycho, Kuiper
crater exhibits a mountainous formation in the center.
Central peaks in circular depressions on planets and moons
are theorized to be the result of subterranean material
"rebounding" after an asteroid impact. The strata is said to
become molten, heaving up like waves in water and then
instantly freezing in place, forming a pinnacle and multiple
ridges that outline the perimeter. The brighter ray material
is thought to be different in composition from the
surrounding plains because it was blasted out from deep
beneath the crust and is "unweathered."
The
floor of Kuiper crater is flat and smooth, again much like
Tycho, with periodic undulations that could indicate frozen
ripples left behind when the molten surface re-solidified.
However, an impact hypothesis fails to find support in
hypersonic pellet experiments or in the evidence from atomic
explosions. Not even hydrogen bombs create flat, melted
crater floors.
A
closer examination of the
bright surface rays around Kuiper crater reveals smaller
craters mixed in with the shallow streamers—a phenomenon
much like that seen on the Moon. In fact, many of the rays
terminate in small craters. According to conventional
analysis, the tiny craters around Tycho (most too small to
be resolved with Earth-based telescopes) are "secondary
impact points" created by larger chunks of crust
interspersed amidst the dusty debris thrown out from the
initial strike.
Because Mercury has no atmosphere and no magnetic field to
shield it from the Sun, it may be possible to describe it in
terms that have previously been applied to the Moon. If the
craters and rays so prominent there can be explained by
electrical activity, then Mercury's features might also be
illuminated by that electrical hypothesis.
Ralph Juergens has been mentioned several times in
previous Picture of the Day articles, with many Electric
Universe concepts based on his work. In an initial
1974 treatise that took issue with the consensus opinion
regarding lunar formations, he wrote:
"....not only the presence of the secondary craters in
connection with 'each ray element,' but their placement
always 'at the near end,' poses a problem for the ejection
hypothesis. Is it conceivable that larger objects randomly
mixed with fines in ejecta streams would always manage to
drop to the surface just at the inner ends of fallout
patterns produced by the fines? The strange proportions of
Tycho's long rays seem all-but-impossible to reconcile with
ejection origins. Enormous velocities of ejection must be
postulated to explain the lengths of the rays, yet the
energetic processes responsible for such velocities must be
imagined to be focused very precisely to account for the
ribbon thin appearance of the rays."
Juergens surmised that Tycho crater was a lightning scar—the
touchdown point for a plasma discharge between two
electrically charged celestial bodies. The hard, smooth,
radar-reflective floor of Tycho, as well as the lack of
depth to its rays, indicated to him that kinetic forces from
mechanical impact were not sufficient to explain those
attributes.
According to Juergens, Tycho's rays are the paths that
electrons formed when the secondary discharge erupted into
space,
completing a circuit with the lighting leader stroke. It
is probable, based on that analysis, that rays around
craters are not ejected material that flew outward from an
impact event, but are the mark of charged particles rushing
inward toward the center, dragging fine dust along with them
because of attractive forces.
Rays, central peaks and flat floors are not
the only peculiar aspects to craters observed on Mercury,
Earth's Moon, and other smaller moons circling the gas giant
planets. Concentric rings like bulls-eye targets are
another. In Picture of the Day articles about Jupiter's moon
Callisto, Saturn's moon
Tethys, and
Mercury itself, multi-ringed basins have been shown to
be a signature of electric discharge machining (EDM). The
latest images from MESSENGER display other concentric
craters, such as
Vivaldi, in addition to the more well-known
Caloris Basin.
Regarding EDM effects on planetary bodies, especially
Mercury, Electric Universe theorist and author
Wal Thornhill wrote:
"In
the case of the interplanetary thunderbolt, we are talking
about billions of amperes (giga-amperes). Such a powerful
current will magnetically ‘pinch’ down to produce circular
ringed craters and features like Caloris. Current flows
radially between the current cylinders through the surface
layers causing melting and etching of the crater floor or
basin. So, paradoxically, a more sustained but widespread
(and therefore lesser current density) discharge was
probably responsible for the huge Caloris basin. The pattern
of ‘fractures’ on the floor of Caloris basin is similar to
the radial and concentric discharge patterns seen in the
dense plasma focus device where the discharge current is
forced to flow radially between two concentric conductors."
Taken together, it is more likely that Mercury's strange
terrain is not so strange after all. What appears unusual to
the consensus scientific community is readily explicable if
electricity is considered to be one of the forces involved.
Whenever conventional scientists admit to being puzzled, or
whenever "unexpected" results are returned by space probes,
it is a sure bet that they are not taking into account the
power of the force that steers the stars.
By Stephen Smith
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!