Aug 14, 2007
Gamma Ray Bursters
Gamma-ray bursts could
indicate the merging of neutron stars—if the universe
contained neutron stars instead of plasma. GRB's have a
simple explanation in the Electric Universe Model.
A gamma-ray burst (GRB) is a flash of high-energy
radiation that lasts up to a few seconds. GRBs appear randomly
around the sky at a rate of about one a day. An afterglow in x-ray
and optical light may follow the burst and fade over several days.
Analysis of afterglows enabled astronomers to link GRBs with “host”
galaxies and the longer-lasting bursts with supernovas. Until this
year, afterglows following the shorter bursts had not been detected.
A burst that lasted a tenth of a second was detected
on July 9, 2005. Thirty seconds later, a 150-second x-ray flash
was observed, and the location of the burst could be pinpointed. A
few days later, the Hubble Space Telescope obtained this image of
the optical afterglow and the “host” galaxy. (The afterglow is the
bright dot to the left of the extended image of the galaxy.)
According to conventional theories, the redshift of
this galaxy determines its distance at about two billion light
years. To appear as bright as it did, the GRB must have given off
more energy in that one-tenth of a second than the entire galaxy
gives off in a year. The only mechanisms imaginable in a
gravity-dominated universe that could be this “energy-dense” are
extreme supernovas and neutron-star or black-hole mergers. Because
no supernova was observed and because the GRB occurred at the edge
of the galaxy (most black holes are thought to reside in galactic
cores), this GRB is considered to be the result of a merger of
neutron stars.
This explanation makes sense—if redshift is indeed a
measure of distance and if the universe is composed of insignificant
amounts of plasma. Unfortunately,
redshift has been shown for decades NOT to be a measure of
distance, and the composition of the universe is 99.99%
plasma.
This GRB and its “host” galaxy are closer, probably
much closer, than standard theory calculates. The energy of the GRB
is therefore much less than standard theory calculates. The small,
faint “host” galaxy doesn’t appear small and faint because it’s far
away but because it really is small and faint.
Even if it were at its conventional distance, and
even if it did have its conventional energy,
plasma mechanisms—that is, electrical discharge mechanisms—could
provide the necessary density of energy with processes that can be
studied in
laboratory settings. (Black holes and neutron stars are
exclusively manipulations of mathematics and have no empirical
counterparts.)
The primary sources of information about GRBs are
their spectra and their time histories. The spectra indicate
emission of x-rays from highly excited ions and from fast electrons.
The time histories vary greatly but generally show a fast rise of
energy and a gradual fading. Sometimes one or more lower-energy
pulses precede the peak energy pulse; often other spikes, which also
show the fast-rise-slower-decline profile, interrupt the decline in
energy.
Even with many factors that can be adjusted,
conventional theory has a hard time matching a model to the
observations. But the excited ions, fast electrons, and range of
energy curves are common properties of lightning. They occur—at the
appropriate energy levels—in lab discharges, atmospheric lightning,
solar flares, supernovae, and, now, in GRBs. Experiments and
computer simulations have shown that plasma phenomena can be scaled
over
many orders of magnitude—that is, they behave in much the same
manner and obey the same principles from the atomic scale to the
galactic.
A century of
research in plasma and half a century of space exploration have
demonstrated that we live in an electric universe. Only traditional
astronomical theory is living in another universe—the
universe of denial.
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!