Apr 25,
2007
Ultra Luminous Astronomy
Over the last decade,
the acronym UL has been creeping into the field of
cosmology. It has the impressive meaning of "ultra-luminous"
or "beyond bright". In at least two categories, this
superlative is a distortion caused by the theoretical
interpretation of observations rather than a direct
description of observations.
Take the case of
ULIRGs -- Ultra Luminous Infra Red Galaxies. Arp 220,
pictured above, is the brightest of the ULIRGs. (Astronomer
Halton Arp compiled the Catalogue of Peculiar Galaxies,
in which this object is number 220.) The standard
interpretation calculates its distance by the amount its
spectral lines are shifted toward longer wavelengths (redshift).
To be this bright at that distance, it must be generating
light far more copiously than any other astronomical body.
Hence, it is "ultra-luminous. "Proponents of the standard
interpretation speculate that the excess energy is produced
by a collision of two galaxies behind an obscuring cloud of
gas and dust. But if redshift were caused by some mechanism
intrinsic to the body, Arp220 could be close enough to be of
normal luminosity. If it were even closer, it might be
"Under-Luminous."
Do we have any
evidence that Arp 220 is closer than its redshiftdistance --
other than the fact that it appears too bright for
conventional astronomical theories of how galaxies should
work? The evidence is there, but it takes a couple of steps
to understand.
For the past few
years, astronomer Margaret Burbidge has been using her
telescope time to study discordant redshift associations. In
2001,she, Halton Arp and the Chinese astronomer, Y. Chu,
published a paper about the objects in the vicinity of Arp
220. They discovered two pairs of quasars flanking the
nucleus north and south of Arp 220. In addition another
double pair of quasars forms an s-shaped line to the east
and west of Arp 220. And there is a previously discovered
"background cluster" of four tiny galaxies that just happen
to fall in a straight line pointing directly at the nucleus
of Arp 220. The conventional explanation for these
discordant-redshift associations is that the quasars and
galaxies are grouped together by coincidence. The extreme
improbability of that being the case is overlooked.
The second step
is to notice that the discordant-redshift objects tend to
occur in pairs that have about the same redshift and that
are located symmetrically on opposite sides of the primary
object's nucleus. Furthermore, the redshifts of these pairs
tend to decrease in well-demarked steps with distance from
the primary object. To believe "background objects" could be
so arranged by chance is to abandon discernment.
Arp interprets
these associations as family groups. All are located in the
vicinity of the primary body. The higher-redshift bodies
have been ejected from the lower-redshift bodies. As the
ejected bodies age and grow into normal galaxies, their
luminosities increase and their redshifts decrease. Rather
than being a coincidental clump, they are an evolving
population of genetically linked objects.
If the observed
stepwise redshift is intrinsic to associations of galaxies
and quasars, there is no reason to prefer a redshift-determined
distance to a luminosity-determined distance. The observed
luminosity of Arp 220 would place it much closer, not only
in distance from us but also in correspondence with known
processes of energy production.
Similar
considerations with regard to other ULIRGs would negate UL
astronomy and the big bang cosmology, which depends on
redshift being an indicator of distance, that gave rise to
it.