Oct 11,
2006
The Search for Two
Numbers
Astronomy's obsessive search for the two
numbers--the Hubble Constant and the age of the universe--is
based upon an unwarranted assumption, i.e., redshift equals
distance.
Alan Sandage,
talking about Hubble/Humason's 1931 paper that first
suggested there is a connection between redshift and
distance of galaxies, said:
"Judged by its subsequent
influence, the paper by Hubble and Humason (1931) was one of
the great, prescient early papers in observational
cosmology. It outlined the central research trends that
continued well beyond the middle third of the twentieth
century. From 1929 until the discovery of the of the Alpher-Herman
microwave background in 1965 this was the field of
"practical cosmology" which was once described as "simply
the search for two numbers" in contrast to the wondrous new
theoretical cosmology of today that combines high-energy
particle physics with theories of the very hot early
universe."
The highway to
modern cosmology began in the mid-1920's, also as a result
of Hubble's work. Other astronomers were still arguing the
150-year-old debate, "Is the Milky Way the only galaxy?"
(Most said "yes"--the universe isn't big enough for more
than one galaxy.) But Hubble was taking photos of the nearby
galaxies M31 and M33, cataloging their stars and trying to
determine how far away they are. The three papers he
published in 1925, 1926, and 1929 proved to astronomers for
the first time that there is a universe beyond the Milky
Way. If this was the beginning of the highway of cosmology,
then Hubble's redshift/distance article was the first major
fork in the road. Everyone took the same turn, the turn that
led to the big bang and to tired light. This was the
hypothesis that determined the course of 20th century
cosmology.
The "two
numbers" that cosmology chased for so long were the Hubble
Constant (how fast the universe is expanding) and the age of
the universe (when it began.) This search was the "Key
Project" for which the Hubble Space Telescope was built.
These numbers provide the only tool we have for determining
the distance of most galaxies, and they provide the only
justification we have for believing that the universe is
expanding and that it began with a bang. The "wondrous new
technical cosmology of today" Sandage refers to (above)
consists of inventing new concepts to explain why
observations don't match predictions based on the
long-sought "two numbers."
What lies down
the second fork of the cosmological highway? In the late
1960's, Halton Arp discovered evidence that the redshift/distance
connection is a dead end. It doesn't work. You can't
determine a galaxy's distance by its redshift because Arp
has documented hundreds of cases where galaxies of different
redshifts are grouped together at the same distance.
Arp was one of
Hubble's students, and, like Hubble, based his research on
careful observations more than on theoretical
considerations. But astronomers were committed to chasing
two numbers, so they ignored Arp's evidence, and in the
mid-1980's they found a way to deny him both telescope time
and publication in the astronomical journals.
Today a few
professional astronomers and a large number of amateurs are
interested in following the second fork of the cosmological
highway. It's not an easy path, but for some the threat of
no promotion or even loss of position is less important than
the goal of astronomical discovery. And amateurs have the
advantage of no position to lose. Will the second fork of
the highway be more fruitful? Will there be third and fourth
and fifth forks as well? It will be interesting to look back
a century from now on how history judges our first attempts
to understand the universe beyond our home galaxy.
[See Arp's
lecture video, "Intrinsic
Redshift," for more details of this new picture
of the universe.] Available from Mikamar Publishing
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!