Oct 03,
2006
The "Iron Sun" Debate (2)
The Myth of the Neutron Star
In his argument for
the “Iron Sun”, Oliver Manuel relies on a popular
theoretical concept—the “neutron star”. Electrical
theorists, on the other hand, say there is no reason to
believe that such exotic stars exist.
At the core of
the Crab Nebula pictured above is a remarkable churning
“wheel-and-axle” structure (inset) whose discovery shocked
astronomers. No conventional model of supernova remnants
ever anticipated exotic structures comparable to what is
seen here.
Some things are
known about the Crab Nebula, however. It is close to certain
that it is the result of a supernova observed from Earth in
1054 A.D. The inner ring of the central “motor” has a
diameter of about one light year. Intensely energetic jets
stream outward from the central light source in two
directions along the axis of an intense magnetic field.
Additionally, observations over time have shown that rings
and strands of material are moving outward on the equatorial
plane at great speeds, some up to half the speed of light.
The point of
light at the center of the image is a pulsar, so
called because it generates pulses at radio frequencies
roughly 60 times a second. (Pulses can also be observed
optically and in X-rays.)
But what cause
these rapid pulses? Most astronomers today attempt to
interpret pulsars using a strange idea based entirely on
mathematical conjectures. They say that the pulsar is a tiny
spinning “neutron star”—the collapsed remains of the
historic supernova.
Neutron stars
were predicted theoretically in the 1930's to be the end
result of a supernova explosion. For many years astronomers
doubted their existence. But then, with the discovery of the
first pulsar in 1967, astronomers imagined that the pulses
were due to a rapidly rotating beam of radiation sweeping
past the Earth. Having ignored all of the things that
electricity can do quite routinely, the theorists were
required to conceive a star so dense that it could rotate at
the rate of a dentists drill without flying apart. So the
neutron star received a second life. The energy of the
star’s radiation, it was supposed, came from in-falling
matter from a companion star.
The imaginative
construct received no support from later observations. In
the Crab Nebula, what we now see is not gravitational
accretion, but material accelerated away from the central
star. In fact, all of the weird and wonderful things said
about neutron stars, such as the super-condensed
"neutronium" or "quark" soup from which they are claimed to
have formed, lie outside the realm of verifiable science.
They are abstractions disconnected from nature, but required
to save a paradigm that has no other force than gravity to
provide compact sources of radiation.
Oliver Manuel
and the Iron Sun advocates have taken a daring step in
questioning conventional fictions about the Sun. But
unfortunately, they have relied upon another popular
fiction. They suggest that the Sun was formed by accretion
of heavy elements, chiefly iron, onto a “neutron star”
following a supernova explosion. They further claim that
energy from neutrons, supposedly repelled from its neutron
star core, accounts for the Sun's radiant energy and the
source of protons in the solar wind. The model does not
explain the acceleration of the solar wind out past the
planets (a crucial requirement according to electrical
experts).
Such
speculations, resting upon the earlier flights of
cosmological fancy, beg the question as to the origin of all
other stars. Supernovae are exceedingly rare events, and
there is no sound reason to believe that neutron stars are
even physically possible.
However
appealing the original logic may have been to some, the
neutron star model should have been discarded when pulsars
were found with supposed “spin” and cooling rates that
required the mathematicians to conjure ever more dense and
exotic particles–like
quarks–that have never been observed.
Critics of the
“neutron star” hypothesis say that it is a violation of
common sense to speak of matter being gravitationally
compressed to the point that the orbiting electrons in an
atom are forced to join with the protons in the nucleus to
form neutrons. The nearly 2000-fold difference in weight
between the electron and the proton will ensure charge
separation in an intense gravitational field. Each atom will
become a tiny radial electric dipole that assists charge
separation. And the electric force of repulsion is 39 orders
of magnitude stronger than gravity, so extremely weak charge
separation is sufficient to resist gravitational
compression. The force of gravity is effectively zero in the
presence of the electric force.
All of today’s
popular ideas about supernovae, the supposed progenitors of
neutron stars, were formulated under a gravity-only ideology
that has, in recent decades, been challenged (and electric
theorists would say overturned) by the discovery of
plasma and powerful electric and magnetic fields in space.
Supernovae have recently been
identified as catastrophic stellar electrical
discharges. The remnant of such a discharge cannot be the
imagined rapidly spinning super-dense object: powerful
electrical forces will always prevent gravitational
"super-collapse."
Plasma
physicists have shown (in the words of K. Healy and A.
Peratt) that the pulsed radiation detected from some
supernova remnants may "…derive either from the pulsar’s
interaction with its environment or by energy delivered by
an external circuit. …[O]ur results support the ‘planetary
magnetosphere’ view, where the extent of the magnetosphere,
not emission points on a rotating surface, determines the
pulsar emission.” These concrete results do not rest on
events merely imagined. And they dovetail with facts that
are now inescapable: electric discharges in plasma are fully
capable of generating the exotic structures of supernova
remnants seen in deep space. The "wheel and axle" form of
the supernova remnant in the Crab nebula is that of a simple
Faraday electric motor. Its structure also conforms to the
stellar circuit diagram espoused by the father of plasma
cosmology, Hannes Alfvén.
It is a pity
that the “Iron Sun” researchers are not conversant with
plasma cosmology and the Electric Sun model. They make a
compelling case against the standard solar model, and their
recent findings of electrically induced nuclear reactions
on the solar surface could open a pathway to discoveries
reaching well beyond solar science.
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!