Sep 28,
2006
Stephan’s Quintet
Rekindles Controversy
New images of the clustered galaxies of Stephan's
Quintet suggest interactions that should not be taking
place. Astronomers have long assumed that one of the
galaxies is far too close to us to physically interact with
the more "remote" members of the group.
Stephan's Quintet is a famous
group of five galaxies discovered by Edouard Stephan in 1877
at Marseille Observatory. Because the group is tangled in
filaments of matter from each other, astronomers assumed
they were near each other and were interacting. (For
orientation, see the overlay of ground-based and Hubble
Space Telescope images
here.) The cluster sparked a controversy in the
'60s when Geoffrey and Margaret Burbridge obtained spectra
of the constituent galaxies. The galaxies' shift toward red
on the spectrum suggested (based on expanding-universe
assumptions) that all but one are receding from Earth at
about the same velocity (~6000 km/s). The 'discordant'
galaxy (NGC 7320) is centered at the bottom of the Hubble
image. Its redshift suggests it is receding much less
rapidly (~800 km/s) and therefore must be considerably
closer to us. Astronomers such as the Burbidges and Halton
Arp argued that the discordant redshift of this galaxy
invalidates the cornerstone of Big Bang and
expanding-universe cosmology: the assumption that redshift
gives a reliable basis for calculating velocity and deducing
present distance.
For many years the issue was
downplayed, but the contradictions couldn't be
resolved.
Then, in the year 2000, based on images from the Hubble
space telescope, expanding-universe astronomers claimed
individual stars could only be seen in the 'close' galaxy,
NGC 7320, thereby proving that NGC 7320 lay in front of the
four interacting background galaxies.
But this was not the end of the story. As can be seen in the
Hubble image (linked above), the 'close' galaxy does indeed
show more details than the cores of the other members of the
group. But it is also apparent that the resolution of NGC
7320 and the interaction debris encircling the 'background
galaxies' NGC 7318A and B reveal comparable levels of detail
and 'clumpiness'. This would argue strongly in favor of the
galaxies being sufficiently close to interact.
One of the most remarkable aspects of Stephan’s Quintet is
the long non-thermal radio-continuum structure lying in
intergalactic space between the galaxies. It is also visible
in X-rays and UV, and recently it was imaged in infrared by
the Spitzer telescope and H-alpha emission. The picture
above is a composite. It clearly shows the giant arc-like
'shock wave' (in green from H-alpha emission) that
astronomers interpret as the effect of a collision between
NGC 7318B and the rest of the group. Of course, 'shock wave'
is not the language that would be used by plasma
cosmologists or proponents of the Electric Universe.
The tantalizing image is the result of work by a team of
scientists from USA, Germany, and Australia, utilizing the
super-sensitive infrared spectrograph of the Spitzer Space
Telescope. It detects the abundance of excited hydrogen
molecules emitting a distinctive type of radiation that can
be detected in the infrared. In standard cosmology,
astronomers will resort to the concept of mechanical shock
to account for this excitement of hydrogen in space; plasma
cosmologists believe that electrical interactions are a far
more efficient explanation. The filamentary and 'dotted'
structure indicates Birkeland currents and electrical
activity, as does the 'synchrotron' (non-thermal) radiation
from charged particles confined by magnetic fields and
moving at velocities close to the speed of light. Electric
discharge is known to be the efficient means of producing
such energies.
"The strength of the emission and the fact that it shows the
gas to be highly disturbed was a huge surprise to us", said
team leader Dr. Phil Appleton. "We expected to see the
spectral signature of dust grains — but instead we saw an
almost pure laboratory-like spectrum of hydrogen molecules
and almost nothing else. It was quite unlike anything we had
seen before in a galaxy system".
What is obvious from this image is that if the 'shock wave'
means dynamic interaction, then there are connections
between the supposed 'intruder', NGC 7318B, (upper right),
and both NGC 7319 (center left) and NGC 7320 (lower left).
But the supposed distance of NGC 7320 from the others, based
on assumptions about redshift, would preclude such
interactions.
Indeed, many characteristics indicate that the galaxies of
Stephan's Quintet are interacting as a group. Both galaxies
on the left (NGC 7319 and NGC 7320) have tails that swing
off to the northeast (upper left). (The tail on NGC 7320
requires a deep exposure to reveal it, as well illustrated
by professor Don Scott in his
discussion
of NGC 7320.) A more unified perspective will see
the larger pattern. The entire group is embedded in a radio
lobe (a bridge of excited matter emitting radio waves) from
the active spiral NGC 7331 to the northeast (out of the
frame). An extension of this energetic lobe also encloses a
group of three galaxies on the opposite side of NGC 7331
that have redshifts similar to the high-redshift members of
Stephan's Quintet. (Those familiar with Arp's observations
will immediately recognize the pattern as a pair of
small-galaxy clusters primordially ejected from NGC 7331.)
The 'mashed together' pair, NGC 7318A and B, which even
conventional astronomers admit are interacting, are
themselves a 'discordant group'. B, on the left, has a
redshift velocity 1000 km/s lower than A. The redshift-equals-distance
assumption would place it in front of its neighbor and
safely out of interaction's way.
It is also worth noting that the galaxy NGC 7319 (upper left
in the image above) is the location of one of the most
shocking challenges to the standard view of redshift. In
front of the galaxy's dense core lies a quasar, an object
whose redshift implies it should be more than 90 times
farther away from us than the big galaxy behind it.
See Picture of the Day
here.
What does all this mean? If the measuring stick
(standard interpretation of redshift) is flawed, so are the
measurements and deductions that follow. And to one degree
or another that includes almost all the themes of standard
cosmology today. The redshift controversy is still very much
alive.
---------------------------------
Thanks to Louis van de Locht and Mel Acheson for the primary
content of this contribution.
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!