Jul 28,
2006
The Baffling Martian Spiders (3)
The remarkable Martian formations called “spiders”
occur only at the planet’s south polar region. But some
observers distinguish between those spiders which appear as
permanent features of the surface, and those which seem to
emerge and disappear seasonally.
A groundbreaking study by C.M. Orme and P.K. Ness, published
in the February 8, 2002 issue of the Journal of the British
Interplanetary Society, examines the spiders in detail. (The
authors titled their study "Spider Ravine Models and Plant
Like Features on Mars—Possible Geophysical and
Biogeophysical Modes of Origins.")
A subsequent study by Orme and Ness, developed in
consultation with renowned science fiction writer Arthur C.
Clark (available at
New Frontiers), concentrated on the enigma of the
changing spiders, suggesting that the comings and goings of
active variants constitute one of the most profound
mysteries ever presented to planetary scientists.
Though the authors do not assert a final position on the
subject, their lines of reasoning imply that a biological
origin may be the only explanation not excluded by the
visual evidence. Orme and Ness note that, in contrast to the
permanent spiders, which include substantial ravine
networks, changing spiders all involve material raised above
the surrounding surface. The branching of these formations
presents well-defined ridges, as seen in the picture above.
But mysteriously, the active spiders grow and retreat
seasonally—even appear to dissolve completely into the
surrounding terrain— the very attributes one might expect of
vegetation.
But the biological interpretation runs into a seemingly
insurmountable problem. It is not reasonable to suggest that
active and inactive spiders are created by unrelated forces.
Inactive spiders, a permanent part of the visible landscape,
are clearly-cut ravines. There is simply no basis for
suggesting a biological character of these permanent ravine
networks. Surely, a credible explanation of the active
spiders cannot ignore the inactive spiders.
The distinctive branching pattern is fundamental to the
authors’ argument: “The branching (bifurcating) structure of
roots, shoots, veins on leaves of plants, etc., have
similarity in form to branched lightning strokes,
tributaries of rivers, physiological networks of blood
vessels, nerves and ducts in lungs, heart, liver, kidney,
brain etc. Such seemingly complex network structure is
associated with exquisitely ordered beautiful patterns
exhibited in flowers and arrangement of leaves in the plant
kingdom.” The reasoning here tends to link branching
structure most “exquisitely” with living systems, though
lightning strokes and tributaries of rivers also reveal
branching patterns.
But Orme and Ness properly note that the mathematical
pattern of “Fibonacci” branching is not typical of river
networks, except by chance. River networks are constrained
by random topography in ways that preclude the mathematical
pattern.
What, then, of lightning? The authors contend that
“Fibonacci patterns are never found in non-biological
phenomena.” But this statement is clearly not correct. In
Part 1 of this series we
noted the “arachnoids” on Venus, identical in both name and
morphology to the Martian spiders. In
Part 2 of this series we
presented a Lichtenberg figure created by an electric arc on
a negatively charged surface. It shows undeniable Fibonacci
branching. We also noted the Lichtenberg pattern of a
lightning strike on a golf course, with prolific branching
remarkably similar to that of the Martian spiders.
Though most treatments of the spiders emphasize temperature
variations affecting surface ice (water and/or CO2),
evidence presented by Orme and Ness systematically excludes
the possibility that spiders are made of CO2 or water ice.
.
“Whatever the spiders are made of, it stands to reason that
the same materials must be found elsewhere on the South
Pole. For example, if the spiders are made of CO2 or water
ice, then other known ice nearby should also be in similar
unusual formations. …The spiders tend to form in early
spring and fade away in autumn … The spiders are forming as
the CO2 is usually already gone and the ground becomes frost
free, and the spiders are shrinking when ice and frost are
returning to the ground. If they are made of ice, then it
needs to be explained why they are affected by temperature
in the opposite way known to ice.”
But the authors appear to have missed a key to the solution,
one in which we have sufficient confidence to assert a
prediction: Both the active and inactive spiders are part of
the permanent Martian topography at the south pole. What
distinguishes the one class from the other is the relative
depth of ice covers in the Martian winter. Following this
reasoning, the growth of the active spiders in the spring
would be nothing more than the effect of sublimation and
Martian winds progressively removing snow and ice layers to
expose the Lichtenberg ridges. The ridges themselves, we
suggest, are not changing in any appreciable way. They are
constituted of surface material glassified by high-energy
electrical arcs striking the south polar region. In this
interpretation, as snow or ice returns in the fall, the
shallow spidery ridges appear to dissolve back into the
terrain.
Could the explanation really be this simple? There is every
reason to explore the electrical interpretation, and NASA’s
disregard of electric possibilities remains a continuing
disservice to the public, though it is the public that
provides the funding on which all of NASA’s activities
depend.
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!