May 02, 2006
Warm Ice Caps and Warmed-over Ideas
Though today’s theoretical frameworks have encouraged impressive
technical feats, they continually discourage scientific
discovery. Spectacular images and data from space are a mark of
technical proficiency, but a larger field of theoretical
possibilities can no longer be ignored.
The caption to this sequence of time-lapse images of
trenches on Mars’ south polar cap explains:
“Each year that Mars Global Surveyor has been in
orbit, the landforms of the south polar residual cap have gotten
smaller, and the carbon dioxide removed from the cap has not been
re-deposited. The implication is that Mars presently has a warm (and
possibly warming) climate, with new carbon dioxide going into the
atmosphere every year. The other implication is that, at some time
in the not-too-distant past, the planet had a colder climate, so
that the layers of carbon dioxide could be deposited in the first
place. If one takes the rate of scarp retreat and projects it
backwards to fill in all of the pits and troughs with the carbon
dioxide that has been removed from them, one finds that the colder
climate might only have occurred a few centuries to a few tens of
thousands of years ago. This kind of time scale is not unlike that
of the climate changes that have been recorded on Earth....”
That the trenches are getting wider because Mars is
getting warmer is a familiar assumption. That an increase in carbon
dioxide will cause an increase in climatic temperature is another
familiar assumption. The trouble with familiar assumptions is that
they seem too true to doubt.
Mars may well be getting warmer, but the first
assumption ignores the unfamiliar discovery that plasma is prevalent
in the solar system and that it has extensive electrical properties.
What else besides global warming might widen the trenches? We’ve
mentioned the
electrical connection in previous Pictures of the Day.
And Mars may well be getting more carbon dioxide in
its thin atmosphere, but the second assumption ignores the
unfamiliar discovery that trapping heat in an atmosphere requires
stopping convection, as with the glass in a greenhouse, rather than
increasing the opacity of the air (which is the effect of increasing
carbon dioxide).
Familiar assumptions are useful. They allow you to
get on with your daily routine. If you questioned every assumption,
you wouldn’t be able to tie your shoelaces in the morning. “We
already have an explanation” is the motto of the technician, whose
goal is to accomplish the task at hand.
Science is not—or at least should not be—technique. The goal of
science is not apply in different ways what has already been
discovered but to discover something new. The motto of the scientist
should be “What else could it be?”
A number of critics—the late Fred Hoyle among
them—have noticed and lamented that the technical success and
fecundity of the space programs have been at the expense of
scientific discovery. Compared with the wide-ranging thought of
prior times, the Age of NASA has brought a culture of conformity to
science, a monoculture of theory that, like a genetically engineered
cornfield, has killed off all the weeds. What is good (or at least
efficient) for a cornfield marks the end of science and the
beginning of a pseudo-religion of One Truth.
Space-age images and data have
consistently contradicted technical expectations. Yet the scientific
reports and analyses stand out in their
non-scientific failure to ask “What else could it be?” Taking plasma
into account, it could be something else entirely.
Mars’ plasma sheath appears to connect directly to
the surface with many small, filamentary Birkeland currents in the
dark discharge mode. The condition is similar to that of
Jupiter's moon Io but at a lower power level.
Miles-high dust devils—electric vortices—scorch the
landscape. Lichtenberg patterns, characteristic of lightning
strikes, appear burned into the soil around
new craters. In this view, the widening of the polar trenches is
an expected feature of cathode sputtering, which occurs around the
edges
of circular depressions and other prominent relief being etched by electrical
discharge machining.
Another intriguing “what else” arises in response to the
“retrocalculation” that the erosion of the ice cap may have begun
only “a few centuries to a few tens of thousands of years ago.” This
time span is similar to that estimated for the occurrence of the plasma
instabilities around Earth that were recorded in
petroglyphs. In view of the ancient testimony connecting
Mars
to such a time of instability, the “global warming” of both
Earth and Mars may stem from the same interplanetary event.