Phobos 2, Soviet Mission to Mars' Moon

Historic planetary instability and catastrophe. Evidence for electrical scarring on planets and moons. Electrical events in today's solar system. Electric Earth.
User avatar
Brigit
Posts: 1478
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:37 pm

Phobos 2, Soviet Mission to Mars' Moon

Unread post by Brigit » Sat Jul 12, 2025 11:14 pm

July Launches in the Electric Universe

Phobos 2 was launched on the 12th of July, 1988.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_2
  • "Phobos 2 was the last space probe designed by the Soviet Union. It was designed to explore the moons of Mars, Phobos and Deimos. It was launched on 12 July 1988, and entered orbit on 29 January 1989.

    Phobos 2 operated nominally throughout its cruise and Mars orbital insertion phase on 29 January 1989, gathering data on the Sun, interplanetary medium, Mars, and Phobos. Phobos 2 investigated the Mars surface and atmosphere and returned 37 images of Phobos[3] with a resolution of up to 40 meters.

    Shortly before the final phase of the mission, during which the spacecraft was to approach within 50 m of Phobos' surface and release two landers (one, a mobile hopper, the other, a stationary platform) contact with Phobos 2 was lost. The mission ended when the spacecraft signal failed to be reacquired on 27 March 1989. The cause of the failure was determined to be a malfunction of the on-board computer.[3]

Over the course of the Space Age, the proponents of the Electric Universe had quite a bit to say about Mars' tiny moon, Phobos. Not in any particular order, here are the reports on Phobos from an Electric Universe perspective.

  • Fantastic Phobos
    Stephen Smith
    Sep 24, 2007
    Conventional theory states that Phobos has been marred by repeated meteor impacts, but could electricity have played a significant role?

    Phobos is the largest of the two moons of Mars. Deimos is so small that studying its surface has been problematic for astronomers because it cannot be readily observed from Earth. Only the Viking 2 orbiter captured close up images. Phobos, on the other hand, has been examined by Earth stations and by satellites sent to Mars orbit.

    In the image above, Stickney crater is visible - a ten kilometer-wide excavation that is nearly the size of Phobos. In previous Thunderbolts Picture of the Day articles, objects with craters almost as large as themselves have been discussed. As we pointed out, the "impact" craters should have blasted the asteroids into fragments, but little sign of the collisions is visible other than the craters. In the case of Phobos, the moon is 28 by 20 kilometers in size, so the crater is nearly half as big! By what scientific measure can we conclude that smashing the moon with an impact of that size will not destroy it?

    Some astronomers have reported that the striations and fracture lines evident around Stickney demonstrate that the moon did undergo severe shock and that it was distorted by the impact of whatever formed the crater. However, on closer examination it was revealed that the striations are, in reality, chains of small craters. No "fracture lines" are visible - no cracks as if from a titanic shock wave passing through the moon's body. In fact, the area surrounding the crater is rounded and smooth with no large blast debris (although the moon is covered with almost a meter of finely divided dust).

    Because Phobos is in the same size range as some asteroids such as Mathilde, Eros and Ida, and it exhibits features like the relatively gigantic craters that are endemic to those bodies, what is the common event that creates such similar structures without obliterating the objects in the first place? The answer is electricity.

    In past reviews of Mars, for example, we have shown that it appears to have been immersed in a plasma flame sufficiently large to gouge out Valles Marineris, Olympus Mons and Arabia Terra in a relatively short period. Gigatons of rock and dust were literally ejected from the planet and thrown into space at escape velocity. Blocks of stone as large as Manhattan Island look like they fell from a great height and shattered on impact, leaving fields of enormous boulders with sharp, angular edges covering hundreds of square miles. Could it be that Phobos, Deimos, Ida and the rest are also the remnants of that overwhelming cataclysm?

    In our potential scenario, the thunderbolts that carved up Mars threw these big chunks of its crust into orbit, as well as into long ellipses around the sun. While ramming through the electrical fields involved with the EDM process, they were smoothed and eroded by the arcs. The result is that Phobos and the asteroids mentioned are covered in dust, have little or no large boulders, are defined by huge craters and look like they're half-melted. Phobos does have one unique boulder, but its placement and size are a distinct anomaly.

    In conclusion, Phobos and Deimos appear to be the remains of a catastrophic event that electrically devastated their parent planet, leaving them as wandering orphans forever looking down on what was once their home.

    By Stephen Smith
Last edited by Brigit on Sat Jul 12, 2025 11:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The important thing in all of this, and something which Velikovsky in his usual intuitive way presaged, is that gravity itself is linked to [subatomic] electrostatics. It is not some innate quality associated with matter, unrelated to its electrical structure." ~Wal Thornhill

User avatar
Brigit
Posts: 1478
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:37 pm

Re: Phobos 2

Unread post by Brigit » Sat Jul 12, 2025 11:30 pm

In 2001 Wal Thornhill wrote this report, drawing attention to the crater chains found on asteroids and comets that are interpreted as "fault structures."

  • The surface complexity of the comet nucleus is due to electrical arc erosion. The “fault structures” are chains of cathode arc craters. The negatively charged comet nucleus behaves as a cold cathode, which has electrons stripped from high points on its surface by the strong electric field near the nucleus. When first seen, comets are in the “glow” discharge mode. As it closes on the Sun, the comet discharge switches to the arc mode. This results in a number of high current density, bright cathode “spots”, which burn a circular pit or crater into the comet’s surface. Each spot is associated with a “cathode jet”. The narrow jet electrically accelerates the evaporated material into space. Cathode spots tend to “jump” around on the cathode surface, giving a flickering effect and forming crater chains. Comet Borrelly seems to be covered in such pits and crater chains. As the comet nucleus rotates, spots will switch off and on because the electric field is strongest on the sunward side. This behaviour has fueled the story of ices subliming in the sunlight.
    Phobos has been described as a captured asteroid. If the electrical model is correct, comet and asteroid origins are the same. So the surfaces should be directly comparable. Here can be seen crater chains and larger circular craters. Particularly striking is the crater chain to the right of center which curves sharply and terminates on a larger crater. Note the similar morphology to Schröter’s Valley. Crater chains are routinely misinterpreted by geologists as indicative of sub-surface faults. Neither impacts nor faults explain this feature.

    In 1871 Professor W. Stanley Jevons, noted author of The Principles of Science (1874), wrote that several of his colleagues “asserted that comets owe many of their peculiar phenomena to electrical action.” That was in the days before modern scientific beliefs disallowed such speculation. Today, astrophysicists are spooked by calculations of the energy required to separate bulk positive charge from negative charge. So more than a century later they treat all astronomical objects as electrically neutral despite the obvious signatures of electrical discharge shown by comets and larger bodies. The adherence to this core belief has crippled astrophysics.
ref: https://www.holoscience.com/wp/comet-bo ... c-beliefs/
"The important thing in all of this, and something which Velikovsky in his usual intuitive way presaged, is that gravity itself is linked to [subatomic] electrostatics. It is not some innate quality associated with matter, unrelated to its electrical structure." ~Wal Thornhill

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest