Modern Astrophysics is nothing but the study of GNOMES

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.
BeAChooser
Posts: 1318
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Modern Astrophysics is nothing but the study of GNOMES

Unread post by BeAChooser » Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:29 am

Look at all the gnomes in this article …

https://interestingengineering.com/scie ... r-big-bang
Researchers from the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) have proposed a new model to explain the origin of dark matter. It suggests that dark matter originated during the infinitesimally short span before the Big Bang when the Universe suddenly expanded to a large extent.

… snip …

In their new study, the researchers propose that inflation also played a role in the formation of dark matter through the freeze-in scenario.
In bold are four of them, none of which they can prove are real, even after half a century of expensive effort. They all depend on faith ... and the existence of each other. Now if you ask me, this is nothing more than magical thinking. For all the good the model does in explaining anything, it might as well contain a fifth gnome … fairies, who *I believe* actually created the DM. They need something to create it. And maybe the existence of fairies would finally mean there will a tangible benefit to taxpayers from discovering DM and its origin. You see, fairies might have a use, unlike DM.

Next, the article states …
“The thing that’s unique to our model is that dark matter is successfully produced during inflation. In most (other) models, anything that is created during inflation is then ‘inflated away’ by the exponential expansion of the universe, to the point where there is essentially nothing left”
If this logic is so obviously obvious, why has it taken the *scientists* in the astrophysics community 40 years to realize this? We’ve been told these people are really smart but it doesn't look that way to me.

Furthermore, I think it’s laughable that they claim that their model "successfully" produces DM, when they still can’t tell us with any confidence what DM is, even after 40 years of expensive searching. Indeed, there are probably an additional 20 gnomes for DM itself ... all with different characteristics, origins, etc. Like I said, modern astrophysics is nothing but gnomes.

In fact, maybe their model also successfully produces unicorns … they’ve just overlooked that *fact* for the past 40 years, as well. But maybe 40 years from now, when they need unicorns to continue scamming taxpayers, they'll suddenly add them to their house of gnomes. See the way it works?

Finally, note the last sentence of the article …
“The study authors are required to validate their WIFI model through observations which could take many years.”
That's called job security and it's the most critical feature of their universe. It's been *designed (frozen) in*. Just saying ...

Roshi
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 4:35 pm

Re: Modern Astrophysics is nothing but the study of GNOMES

Unread post by Roshi » Wed Dec 04, 2024 11:22 am

Why does Elon Musk keep testing and wasting real rockets, instead of doing computer models?
Because anyone who needs useful results knows that there are things that he does not know, and cannot program into a computer model.

Theoretical scientists do not need useful or fast results, that's why they use computer models even for stuff that can be done in reality like a terella. Do they know there are things they don't know they don't know? This is not something learned by doing more science or getting more degrees, it's common sense.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest