What do you suppose they’re really going to be weighing? The money the mainstream has wasted pursuing gnomes?A technique for estimating the mass of gigantic filaments of dark matter
https://cns.utexas.edu/news/research/da ... er-thought
And to fix their mistake, they’re proposing another gnome (of course)?Dark Matter Might Have Formed Earlier than Thought
https://apnews.com/article/dark-energy- ... fd7c3555ec
What they thought about dark energy was wrong, too? I see a pattern developing.NEW YORK (AP) — Distant, ancient galaxies are giving scientists more hints that a mysterious force called dark energy may not be what they thought.
https://news.yahoo.com/news/somewhere-m ... 00919.html
If dark energy isn’t what they thought (and therefore modeled), mightn’t the work of these scientists and their conclusions be flawed too? And seriously, the only use I can see for this study is as part of some dark comedy ... the joke being on us poor taxpayers for funding it.A team of scientists has explored how the strength of dark energy directly affects how easily stars form, and it turns out that the strength of dark energy in our universe doesn't lead to the most efficient star factories.
***********
See where I’m going with this thread? I want this thread to be repository of all the nonsense studies the mainstream is wasting money on. If you post on it, I ask that you post something from the link, even if only the title, then make som pithy comment why it’s nonsense and a waste of money. You can even post just humor as long as it relates to the concern about money wasted … like this …
***********
https://phys.org/news/2024-11-nearby-su ... -dark.html
I think only by frying all the DM scientists.A nearby supernova could end the search for dark matter
***********
Even this somewhat longer entry would seem permissible on this thread …
***********
https://interestingengineering.com/inno ... simulation
In other words, its gravity, gravity, gravity study ... which in and of itself is nonsense. Sure, they claim to model "hot gas", but how much of that is there in a universe that they themselves have told us over and over is 99 percent plasma ... at least?Frontier supercomputer achieves largest-ever exascale universe simulation
… snip …
Salman Habib, the project lead and division director for Computational Sciences at Argonne, explained the dual focus of the simulation, stating, “There are two components in the universe: dark matter — which, as far as we know, only interacts gravitationally — and conventional matter, or atomic matter.”
The idea they are going to learn anything from them without modeling plasma and electric currents make me GIGOle.These simulations require vast computational resources and the integration of complex physics that simulates dark and atomic matter over extensive periods.
***********
See what I did there?
