Tesla and the EU

[ttsoares]

I was exposed to a lot of EU content until today. There are segments of Thornhill's lectures that I can repeat by heart.

But yesterday it downed on me that never ever saw anything about frequencies and resonance in the EU context !

Is all EU only about direct current ? Even though DC can pulsate longitudinally, that is not mentioned here AFAIK.

All the interesting stuff from Tesla is related to high frequency alternated current.

As Wall said many times, a Cosmology must embrace all aspects of our perceived reality.

What I'm missing here ?

[danda]

not directly related to Tesla, but.... one observation I've made is that EU states the universe is electric without ever really defining what electricity *is*.

That can be forgiven to a degree because no one really knows what electricity is. But I think the 19th and early 20th century aether guys, including N. Tesla were getting pretty close before Einstein and pals derailed everything and confused humanity.

In particular I find the BJerknes effect super interesting, which demonstrates that 2 sources of longitudinal waves in water attract and repulse just like magnets, depending on phase. In other words, magnetic field and electric field and even gravity by analogy are wave phenomena. See his book "Fields of Force".

William Lyne in "Occult Ether Physics" points out that N. Tesla claimed to have a complete theory of gravity worked out, and he criticized lots of contemporaries, but never criticized JJ Thompson... indicating that Thompson may have been on the right track. Thompson lays out his concepts in "Electricity and Matter". Both works are worth reading, in particular Lyne's work is some of the most interesting Tesla history and analysis I've come across.

[ttsoares]

IMHO, the “modern” Tesla is Eric Dollard. I have several of his lectures and presentations and most are over my head... but stays a sense that he is really in the 'shoulder of giants' as Stubblefield. Also, Tom Bearden has a thing or two to say about electricity. If you ask me...

Anyhow, Thornhil said several times: "Time travel is impossible."

But AFAIK we can see the smoke, heat and ashes... only the fire itself is missing about the reality of time travel.
Suffice to say about Andrew D. Basiago of 'Project Pegasus' and 'Project Looking Glass'.

'm saying all that because all those practical phenomena are related with electricity, vibrations and resonance...

---------------------------

I deployed a searchable version of my collection of files here: https://whereisit.vercel.app
If anyone got interested, PM me and we'll a path to get the files.

[danda]

IMHO, the “modern” Tesla is Eric Dollard. I have several of his lectures and presentations and most are over my head... but stays a sense that he is really in the 'shoulder of giants' as Stubblefield. Also, Tom Bearden has a thing or two to say about electricity. If you ask me...

yes Eric Dollard is a fascinating character, and worth supporting, even if he is bitter these days. He's had a rough time.

I've recently discovered William Lyne, and would encourage any Tesla enthusiasts to read his works. In particular he goes deeper into Tesla's theory of gravity than I've seen anywhere else.

Anyhow, Thornhil said several times: "Time travel is impossible."

I 100% agree with this. I came to the same conclusion myself long ago when I realized that "time" is simply how we perceive matter in motion. It is not a "dimension" in the sense that one can move around in it or navigate it. It is not fundamental, but only a construct of the mind. The fundamental thing is the rate at which matter moves at every scale and density. That includes orbits (planets, galaxies, maybe electrons) and resonant frequencies.

Every clock we have ever built does one thing: measures matter in motion. whether it is the earth rotating, or going around the sun, or a pendulum, or a piezoelectric crystal oscillating, or a caesium atom oscillating.

small caveat: Maxwell proposed measuring light vibrations which technically would be measuring motion (waves) of the aetheric medium rather than physical matter, but same principle, especially if one believes as I do that the aether is composed of matter at lower scales.

So then, the only way to "travel backwards in time" would be to somehow reverse the motion of every atom and every constituent of the aether in the entire universe, or at least in the local environment. I believe both to be fully impossible and against the fundamental mechanism of nature. Likewise slowing "time" would mean slowing motion of all matter. Travelling to the future would mean speeding up motion of all matter. Of course both are impossible, but if they could be done, then it would mean that the matter which composes the time traveller would likewise be slowed or sped up, so they would not even notice. From this we can also conclude that relative to some theoretical absolute yardstick, the rate of matter's movement could be slowing and speeding up all the time and we have no way of detecting it.

But AFAIK we can see the smoke, heat and ashes... only the fire itself is missing about the reality of time travel.
Suffice to say about Andrew D. Basiago of 'Project Pegasus' and 'Project Looking Glass'.

I don't see any indications of time travel, other than forward, as always.

Frankly I think that "time travel" is just one more of the delusional paradoxes that relativists have dreamed up to confuse everyone and make bright young people shy away from studying natural philosophy, aka physics, because the smart ones realize early on that it doesn't make any sense once one moves beyond newtonian physics. Yet progress was swift in the 19th century when the best and brightest worldwide were working with [more] correct principles of the aether.

[nick c]

In order to travel in time in either direction, one would have to move to wherever that place was located in space. Every sci fi story concerning time travel is impossible due to the geocentric assumptions of the author. The Earth moves, the Sun moves, the Milky Way moves, the Local Group moves, and whatever yet to be discovered larger cosmological structures exist....they also move.

If I were to time travel back to 1776 could I witness Thomas Jefferson at his work? Not really, because even if there was such a possibility to move in time, I would be thousands if not millions or more light years away from the place in the Universe where the 1776 Jefferson was located.

The probabilities are that I would end up in the emptiness of intergalactic space....
We would have no idea where in the Universe the Philadelphia of 1776, was located.

[Maol]

If the technique or technology for moving fore and aft in time becomes understood, the problem of geolocation, or unilocation, or omnilocation, call it what you will, will be the least difficult problem to solve, other than solving for the true barycenter of the infinite universe, we can almost do that now, as we know the relative motions of everything we can see, and who knows, that may turn out to be a moot point because solving for the exact time may also solve for the location, as time and space are one.

[jimmywalter]

What about Matt Livelsberg (Las Vegas bomber) claim that the US and China have "gravitic propulsion systems"?

[ttsoares]

What about Matt Livelsberg (Las Vegas bomber) claim that the US and China have "gravitic propulsion systems"?

Look operation High Jump 1946. The US+CA+AU+NZ+UK were kicked out of Antarctica by ships that emerge from water and made havoc all over the joined armada.

Germany was in the Moon about 1940 and in Mars bout 1950.

The Breakaway civilization is a fact.

But, I digress...

If the X axe is space and the Y axe is time, one could flip those axes 90 degrees and then move through time.
That is an example of child explanation given by someone from the project Pegasus.

[nick c]

If the technique or technology for moving fore and aft in time becomes understood, the problem of geolocation, or unilocation, or omnilocation, call it what you will, will be the least difficult problem to solve, other than solving for the true barycenter of the infinite universe, we can almost do that now, as we know the relative motions of everything we can see, and who knows, that may turn out to be a moot point because solving for the exact time may also solve for the location, as time and space are one.

I don't think that you are understanding the magnitude of the problem of movement over time thru space.

We are talking about a near infinite quantity of variables in order to determine the position in space. The Earth orbits the Sun, the Sun moves through the galaxy. the galaxy moves within the Local Group, the Local Group moves in a larger structure. In fact as far as we can see there are larger and larger structures, for example strings of galaxies, etc. etc.

We could be looking at millions if not billions of light years.

[ttsoares]

From those of the “inside”, like Project Pegasus" (and if memory serves) there is a spacial reference that anchor the three spacial dimensions. It is possible to move only in time but keeping the spacial coordinates “glued” in a specific point. Do not matter all the relative movements in space. No one was reported to be transported to space outside the planet surface. But there is a case when one did appear in some centimeters of water and the consequence was that his feet did appear a fraction of second after - resulting in the lost of the feet.

There are plenty of clues in the Tesla writings, but we can only imagine what Trump's uncle was able to get when Tesla dies.

Anyhow, as I said, there are smoke, ashes and heat... So the possibility of fire is very high.

Also, all this is directly related with electricity, frequencies and resonances. So, the EU should be there to help explain the context.

[nick c]

There are plenty of clues in the Tesla writings, but we can only imagine what Trump's uncle was able to get when Tesla dies.

For what it is worth:

Tesla died during WWII and John Trump (who was an MIT, PhD electrical engineer) was tasked with analyzing Tesla's papers by the US government. I am sure that if there were some astounding new knowledge to be gained from Tesla's papers, that it would have been classified as some level of Top Secret and made unavailable.

Anyway the official story is that there was nothing "workable" in Tesla's papers.

His [Tesla's] thoughts and efforts during at least the past 15 years were primarily of a speculative, philosophical, and somewhat promotional character often concerned with the production and wireless transmission of power; but did not include new, sound, workable principles or methods for realizing such results.

https://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_mispapers.html

[ttsoares]

Tesla died during WWII and John Trump (who was an MIT, PhD electrical engineer) was tasked with analyzing Tesla's papers by the US government. I am sure that if there were some astounding new knowledge to be gained from Tesla's papers, that it would have been classified as some level of Top Secret and made unavailable.

Here is Brazil live a Tesla's grandnephew. That I know personally. From him, and others, we know that the best part of Tesla's papers were smuggled to Europe via a Tesla's parent that was connected with the diplomat from Croatia.

But this is not a space to deal with conspiracies or gossips.
I digress...

My goal to start this thread was to ask opinions of ppl with experience with high frequency electric currents and some knowledge about what leaked from the Montauk Project.

For example: If one access that my site:
https://whereisit.vercel.app/search
and search for *montauk*
one could start to follow the bread crumbs...

[ttsoares]

That searcher I posted above (whereisit) just list files that I have in my database.

If anyone wish any file, PM me so we arrange the access...