The foundation under neutrinos

[ElectroPal]

I postulate in reliable scaling, inverse squaring which is in fact another perfect relationship to the golden ratio. Thus I reverse engineered atomic structure acknowledging confirmed dipole to dipole power soak as neutrinos spin in response to the substructures of electrons and protons giving us gravity. However we must take this fractal down one step further. Consider that the ‘traction’ these neutrinos need is accommodated because neutrinos themselves have a dipole to dipole moment with the fundamental super super subatomic saturation field, which I will call it for now and it’s mistaken for strings and endless particles! This substrate is magnitudes smaller than the neutrinos and is proportionally so fast that it will transfer information across the universe in a split second - thus quantum entanglement and particle popping in double slit experiments explained. This fundamental substrate has a complete harmonic resonance from which our atomic world derives its limits and stability. Because this field is so fast it resolves itself to its base state ( some might think of it as a master molecule) but it will maintain all new informations. So everything we think and do is automatically already in the universe

[Lloyd]

I asked Perplexity.ai to explain your theory. Instead of doing that, if first wanted to tell me what the mainstream's model is. I wasn't interested in that. I wanted to know what your model says. So I commanded it to tell me what your theory is and finally it relented as follows.

The theory presented by ElectroPal is a speculative and unconventional interpretation of particle physics and cosmology that is not supported by mainstream scientific evidence. Here's a breakdown of the key points in this theory:
1. The author claims a relationship between inverse square laws, scaling, and the golden ratio in atomic structures.
2. They propose that neutrinos spin in response to electron and proton substructures, somehow causing gravity.
3. The theory suggests neutrinos have a dipole-dipole interaction with a hypothetical "fundamental super super subatomic saturation field."
4. This proposed field is described as being much smaller and faster than neutrinos, capable of transmitting information across the universe instantly.
5. The author claims this explains quantum entanglement and particle behavior in double-slit experiments.
6. The theory posits that this field has a "harmonic resonance" that determines atomic stability and limits.
7. Finally, it suggests that this field maintains all information, implying that all thoughts and actions are instantly recorded in the universe.
It's important to note that this theory contradicts established scientific understanding of neutrinos, gravity, and quantum mechanics. The concepts presented are not based on peer-reviewed research or empirical evidence, and they do not align with the current scientific consensus on particle physics or cosmology.

Did AI explain your theory correctly?

[ElectroPal]

I want to add to the Saturn alignment hypotheses by pointing out that mars then earth in sequence are each 7 percent less aligned to Saturn’s tilt suggesting that there was a twisty torque as a part of the process of Saturn entering the Suns massive heliopause. Saturn erupted and Venus kicked out but then conservation of energy as Saturn became lighter it sped up and the poor little planet’s spiraled inwards and behind, gaining the mass and slowing into their current orbits but with a discharge battle until equilibrium achieved. So again the fact of this 7 degree slope from planet to planet is telling

[danda]

This fundamental substrate

It's good to see people thinking about "what lies beneath". But I think you aren't going far enough.

I would quibble with this and say that there is no "fundamental" substrate because there is no smallest unit of matter. ever.

Instead, matter is infinitely divisible and there is only scale. Our solar system is atoms at a higher scale. Our atoms are solar systems at scale n-1, and so on. Physical motion at lower scales results in "fields" at our scale. Motions at our scale results in "fields" at higher scales. Our observable universe is equivalent to a drop of water for an observer on an electron in an h2o molecule. Grasp this, and begin to understand what an "infinite" universe actually means. There is no smallest, or largest, or beginning, or end. There just ... is.

or so I see it.