by danda » Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:13 am
ttsoares wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:01 pm
IMHO, the “modern” Tesla is Eric Dollard. I have several of his lectures and presentations and most are over my head... but stays a sense that he is really in the 'shoulder of giants' as Stubblefield. Also, Tom Bearden has a thing or two to say about electricity. If you ask me...
yes Eric Dollard is a fascinating character, and worth supporting, even if he is bitter these days. He's had a rough time.
I've recently discovered William Lyne, and would encourage any Tesla enthusiasts to read his works. In particular he goes deeper into Tesla's theory of gravity than I've seen anywhere else.
Anyhow, Thornhil said several times: "Time travel is impossible."
I 100% agree with this. I came to the same conclusion myself long ago when I realized that "time" is simply how we perceive matter in motion. It is not a "dimension" in the sense that one can move around in it or navigate it. It is not fundamental, but only a construct of the mind. The fundamental thing is the rate at which matter moves at every scale and density. That includes orbits (planets, galaxies, maybe electrons) and resonant frequencies.
Every clock we have ever built does one thing: measures matter in motion. whether it is the earth rotating, or going around the sun, or a pendulum, or a piezoelectric crystal oscillating, or a caesium atom oscillating.
small caveat: Maxwell proposed measuring light vibrations which technically would be measuring motion (waves) of the aetheric medium rather than physical matter, but same principle, especially if one believes as I do that the aether is composed of matter at lower scales.
So then, the only way to "travel backwards in time" would be to somehow reverse the motion of every atom and every constituent of the aether in the entire universe, or at least in the local environment. I believe both to be fully impossible and against the fundamental mechanism of nature. Likewise slowing "time" would mean slowing motion of all matter. Travelling to the future would mean speeding up motion of all matter. Of course both are impossible, but if they could be done, then it would mean that the matter which composes the time traveller would likewise be slowed or sped up, so they would not even notice. From this we can also conclude that relative to some theoretical absolute yardstick, the rate of matter's movement could be slowing and speeding up all the time and we have no way of detecting it.
But AFAIK we can see the smoke, heat and ashes... only the fire itself is missing about the reality of time travel.
Suffice to say about Andrew D. Basiago of 'Project Pegasus' and 'Project Looking Glass'.
I don't see any indications of time travel, other than forward, as always.
Frankly I think that "time travel" is just one more of the delusional paradoxes that relativists have dreamed up to confuse everyone and make bright young people shy away from studying natural philosophy, aka physics, because the smart ones realize early on that it doesn't make any sense once one moves beyond newtonian physics. Yet progress was swift in the 19th century when the best and brightest worldwide were working with [more] correct principles of the aether.
[quote=ttsoares post_id=11340 time=1735938089 user_id=30321]
IMHO, the “modern” Tesla is Eric Dollard. I have several of his lectures and presentations and most are over my head... but stays a sense that he is really in the 'shoulder of giants' as Stubblefield. Also, Tom Bearden has a thing or two to say about electricity. If you ask me...
[/quote]
yes Eric Dollard is a fascinating character, and worth supporting, even if he is bitter these days. He's had a rough time.
I've recently discovered William Lyne, and would encourage any Tesla enthusiasts to read his works. In particular he goes deeper into Tesla's theory of gravity than I've seen anywhere else.
[quote]
Anyhow, Thornhil said several times: "Time travel is impossible."
[/quote]
I 100% agree with this. I came to the same conclusion myself long ago when I realized that "time" is simply how we perceive matter in motion. It is not a "dimension" in the sense that one can move around in it or navigate it. It is not fundamental, but only a construct of the mind. The fundamental thing is the rate at which matter moves at every scale and density. That includes orbits (planets, galaxies, maybe electrons) and resonant frequencies.
Every clock we have ever built does one thing: measures matter in motion. whether it is the earth rotating, or going around the sun, or a pendulum, or a piezoelectric crystal oscillating, or a caesium atom oscillating.
small caveat: Maxwell proposed measuring light vibrations which technically would be measuring motion (waves) of the aetheric medium rather than physical matter, but same principle, especially if one believes as I do that the aether is composed of matter at lower scales.
So then, the only way to "travel backwards in time" would be to somehow reverse the motion of every atom and every constituent of the aether in the entire universe, or at least in the local environment. I believe both to be fully impossible and against the fundamental mechanism of nature. Likewise slowing "time" would mean slowing motion of all matter. Travelling to the future would mean speeding up motion of all matter. Of course both are impossible, but if they could be done, then it would mean that the matter which composes the time traveller would likewise be slowed or sped up, so they would not even notice. From this we can also conclude that relative to some theoretical absolute yardstick, the rate of matter's movement could be slowing and speeding up all the time and we have no way of detecting it.
[quote]
But AFAIK we can see the smoke, heat and ashes... only the fire itself is missing about the reality of time travel.
Suffice to say about Andrew D. Basiago of 'Project Pegasus' and 'Project Looking Glass'.
[/quote]
I don't see any indications of time travel, other than forward, as always.
Frankly I think that "time travel" is just one more of the delusional paradoxes that relativists have dreamed up to confuse everyone and make bright young people shy away from studying natural philosophy, aka physics, because the smart ones realize early on that it doesn't make any sense once one moves beyond newtonian physics. Yet progress was swift in the 19th century when the best and brightest worldwide were working with [more] correct principles of the aether.