Black Holes Light Up

[mharratsc]

From http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006 ... ght_up.htm

I'm not gonna even bother posting the whole article here, because it's nothing more than a reaffirmation of their "We don' need no steenking telescopes! Vamanos!" theoretical, computerized drivel.

What I found immensely entertaining was the embedded video on the page! Check out the computer model 1:02 into the video... you'll see something that looks intensely like the below video demonstrating Focus Fusion:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Byf5_e2W8Hs

The resemblance, to me, is unmistakable.

Mike H.

[earls]

Speaking of, they have had their first success:

http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/a ... and_pinch/

[junglelord]

Since he is doing his work in a computer, its time to point out that the program that he is running is based on a inaccurate matrix.

I think its important to mention the work of Stephen Crothers and ric = 0
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Ricci.html

Black Holes are not fundamentally sound, because the entire concept of the radius becoming a black hole means you can divide by zero.

It's kind of like how they sell "Maxwells theorums", yet they are infact Heaviside reductions.
If we would just do our home work and check the ORIGINALS, you will find inaccuracies as to how the data has been interperted to the general public, which is found no where in the originals...something is fishy in denmark.

[mharratsc]

Speaking of, they have had their first success:

http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/a ... and_pinch/

Awesome!! Way to go Eric and team!!

I will cheer and hoot when the focus fusion reactors go live in commercial applications, while they continue to spend billyuns and billyuns on tokamaks that will never achieve stability...

Keep up the great work, FF team!


Mike H.