The Ultimate Theory is Here!

[AndyM]

Gentlemen,

I think we might finally have a theory which explains everything which is the nilpotent dirac equation developed by Dr Peter Rowlands of Liverpool University UK and outlined in his book "From Zero to Infinity".

Rowlands is a quantumn physiscst and computer scientist and the nilpotent dirac equation is a universal rewrite system derived from the concept zero (i.e. a programme which creates itself from nothing and sums to nothing) which is shown to produce 3D space +1 time at iteration 64 and predicts all know particle properties. Not only this but it also shows how DNA is a subset of this rewrite programme and encodes biological life in a similar way.

Effectivley the Universe is a quantumn computer and this is its code which automatically allows consciousnes to emerge as well.

For Nassim Harramein fans it appears his theories are a subset showing how this rewrite code sturctures the vaccum of space fractorally at all scales. Information is encoded holographically universally and instantly explaining wave particle duality, EPR and merging quantum mechanics with relativity.

Too good to be true? It appears not - The theory not only is highly predictive and in agreement with all known results. There are a lot of pear reviewed science papers on this and the best place to start is the British Computer Society Cybernetic Machine Code specialists Group pages here http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=ConWebDoc.15594

Finally the best thing about this theory is it makes perfect sense.

[Grey Cloud]

Oh whoopee, another ultimate theory from an expert.

Finally the best thing about this theory is it makes perfect sense.

They all do to someone.

[AndyM]

Dear Grey Cloud,

Glad you're so knowleagable you can comment without any research - I don't post this type of stuff lightly and I can assure you that this new formalism of the Dirac equation is seriously powerful stuff.

With all due respect I suggest you go read the papers, and engage your brain prior to opening your comment page - this site deserves better.

With respect


Andy M

[Grey Cloud]

Hi ANdy,
You wrote:

Glad you're so knowleagable you can comment without any research

So am I.
I wish I had a pound for every one of these latest wing-ding scientific threoies that I have seen over the last several decades. Or, better still, I wish each one of them had gone some way to reducing the pollution of the air, the land and the sea caused, in large, by other experts
Prediction #1 In another few months or so, another amazing theory will appear.
Prediction #2 This particular theory wont make a blind bit of difference to anything.

[Lloyd]

* I haven't looked all through your link, but I found that Hilbert and black holes are mentioned, so here are some links you need to see that show that Hilbert made some mathematical errors and that mathematical singularities don't exist in the real world, thus black holes don't exist. What are thought to be black holes are electrical plasma effects.
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/index.html
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.c ... ms1989.pdf
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=site%3At ... mf0jJ9P_V0
* Here's a humorous video on the subject:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4GFAjX62Yg
* Here's Wal Thornhill's Theory of Everything, which provides a theory based on the reality of plasma and electrical forces:
http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?art ... 8df&pf=YES
* On this thread http://thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/v ... 025#p23746 I posted Crothers' recent recommended links on WMAP, CMB etc which has one link http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/ ... -19-01.PDF which suggests that Planck's constant is not constant and therefore quantum mechanics is undermined. I mention that, because I noticed that your link involves quantum mechanics.
* If you remove the errors from the article, what's left may be very helpful material.
* Here's a discussion of the Aether Physics Model, which may have some things in common with your link:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpB ... ?f=8&t=338

[StevenO]

Dear Grey Cloud,

Glad you're so knowleagable you can comment without any research - I don't post this type of stuff lightly and I can assure you that this new formalism of the Dirac equation is seriously powerful stuff.

With all due respect I suggest you go read the papers, and engage your brain prior to opening your comment page - this site deserves better.

With respect

Andy M

The only thing stated in the paper that rings universally true to me is that indeed we can only "represent" our universe as an infinite recursion into an imaginary dimension of space, also known as "time". The universe itself just smiles at us while it wonders how it is that we are unable to see that 0.33333333333333.... is actually 1/3.

[AndyM]

Dear Lloyd,

Thanks for joining in - don't worry I'm well aware of all of your links and have read all of Crothers papers and objections to Black Holes "As Currently Formulated" I am in total agreement with him.

However so far as Peter Rowlands work is concerned there are numerous papers and the issues are dealt with - suffice to say that I think Crothers objections are dealt with as definitions change once you plug in the Nilpotent Dirac equation. Crothers is part of the AIAS (ECE Theory) group which is proposing a new theory of Einstein's general relativity which includes rotation, tortion and coralis effects - Pretty similar to Harramein and Rauschers papers on Black Holes and Universal Scaling laws (again Black Holes in the context of what they are saying are completely different to Crothers objections - i.e. they aren't really black holes).

What comes out of all of these is that the universe breaks down to a fractal/holographic type structure self similar at all scales - What does that remind us off - Plasma Physics and the Electric Universe - scales up from Lab to Galaxy formations!

Peter Rowlands formalism for the Nilpotent Dirac equation is the base construction for these scaling events and shows how these structures evolve from first principles and encode all universal information with a self starting code which generates new code automatically - All of this stems from work in the quantum computing field and AI field which is seeking not only to understand universal process but also how this throws out consiousness which science has so far ignored and seems to be a fundamental key to part of these process's - i.e the observer in QM process.

This is a huge body of work and you have to read it all. Suffice to say that it fits in neatly with EU theory, address's all the black hole and big bang stuff and is supportive of EU and Crothers objections because the nilpotent dirac base redefines what these things really are.

Any way having been a fan of EU Theory, and ECE theory but also being aware that at the fundamental level the Universe as a conscious QM computer is probably going to be fundamental I think this is pretty exciting stuff!!!

[junglelord]

Sounds good, you have encourage me to read the entire work. I love Dirac Negitive Energy and have promoted it here before and have also promoted that it is indeed a fractal. Infact the work of both Fenyman, Mead, Dirac, Faraday Inductance, Maxwells Original Quaternions, Tesla magnifying transmitters, TT Brown, its all there.

[Lloyd]

being aware that at the fundamental level the Universe as a conscious QM computer is probably going to be fundamental I think this is pretty exciting stuff!!! - Andy

* I don't know about all that Dirac et al stuff, but it's pretty obvious to me that no one will ever explain consciousness in terms of "physical reality". Instead, all that can happen is that "physical reality" will be explained in terms of consciousness. In other words, every atom, particle, or aspect of physical reality will be found to be units of consciousness. Since knowledge is consciousness, whatever comes to be known can only be consciousness and nothing else. Si?

[Grey Cloud]

being aware that at the fundamental level the Universe as a conscious QM computer is probably going to be fundamental I think this is pretty exciting stuff!!! - Andy

* I don't know about all that Dirac et al stuff, but it's pretty obvious to me that no one will ever explain consciousness in terms of "physical reality". Instead, all that can happen is that "physical reality" will be explained in terms of consciousness. In other words, every atom, particle, or aspect of physical reality will be found to be units of consciousness. Since knowledge is consciousness, whatever comes to be known can only be consciousness and nothing else. Si?

Very well stated Lloyd. I would add that all this talk of the 'quantum computers', 'fractal Universe', 'holographic Universe', etc is putting the cart before the horse. Human inventions may well be (piss-poor) analogs of the Universe but the Universe is not an analog of any human invention.

[junglelord]

Here is my thread on Dirac's Sea of Negitive Energy
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpB ... ?f=8&t=800

[AndyM]

Dear Lloyd and Greycloud -

One of the exciting points of the nilpotent dirac solution is that consciousness seems to emerge from it - hence dealing with your objection on this ground. As for holographics, fractals and quantumn computing they are natural process's which we hope to and in the case of MRI Scanning do use - they are not Human inventions.

You may also be interested to note that working out who's working with and supporting who in science is quite interesting: Lloyds hero S Crothers is on the board of the Telesio Galilei Acadamy of Sciences - Myron Evans of the AIAS is Chairman - see Einstein Carten Evans Theory: Elizabeth Rauscher is on the Advisory Board - Co Author of papers on scaling and black/hole white hole Universe with Nassim Harramein - Dr Vannessa Hill is a member - co - aiuthor of paper with Peter Rowlands on nilpotenet Dirac re-write as applicable to DNA. Hill and Rowlands are also part of Uni Phi Consortium which is linked in with Rascher and Harramein. Ruggerro Santilli is also featured amongst all of this in terms of quite a lot of respect for his theories and ideas. Oh and Wal Thornhill is also a member of Telesio Galilei Acadamy.

I think what you can see if you look at this and other groupings is that there seems to be a lot of correspondance between ECE Theory, EU, Santilli Hadronics and Nilpotent Dirac - Though I'm sure it would be overstating it to say every one was in total agreement on all points....

Anyway I have given you the links you can either read and digest or not as you see fit.

Regards to you both and thanks for the comments - on this point thanks also to Jungle Lord and his links

Andy

[StevenO]

<...>
You may also be interested to note that working out who's working with and supporting who in science is quite interesting: Lloyds hero S Crothers is on the board of the Telesio Galilei Acadamy of Sciences - Myron Evans of the AIAS is Chairman - see Einstein Carten Evans Theory: <...>

I own the book on ECE theory. Worst $65 I have ever spend. Having ME as the chairman of your science board is the surest way to make sure that the scientific acceptation will be below zero.

This is how a Nobel price winning fellow countryman was exemplifying his work:

How to become a bad theoretical physicist.

[junglelord]

I remember ECE! I had just joined the forum, had just learned a few things about Einsteins theory that claimed that it could be unified via electric torsion. I still thought that Relativity had to be correct and had only heard about the EU. I dove into Maxwells Quaternions, excluded Heaviside, sought out Tesla and never looked back.

[StevenO]

I remember ECE! I had just joined the forum, had just learned a few things about Einsteins theory that claimed that it could be unified via electric torsion. I still thought that Relativity had to be correct and had only heard about the EU. I dove into Maxwells Quaternions, excluded Heaviside, sought out Tesla and never looked back.

Thanks JL, you always know how to find a kind word.

But I still want my $65 back!