Hi Sparky. I have spent some time going back through a lot of the TPOD's. Great stuff there, I was looking at the more recent TPOD of the missing holes in the radiation, but now I actually found the one you were referencing.
The observation is that redshift does not correlate to speed toward or away from the observer, as their exist systems containing signatures of differing redshifts.
The theory is intrinsic redshift as a property of matter. Is there observational evidence to suggest this? Can someone dumb down for me what that would really mean that redshift is an intrinsic property of matter? Is their speculation that their exists matter states, (ie spin, energy level, ionization/conductivity/resistance, etc.) that do not absorb along the standard model of absorption?
According to wiki : Pulsar's are ejected, maintain angular momentum, and begin spinning at rapid rates but are ultimately slowing down. The crab pulsar for instance is calculated as having 1.4 solar-masses and a radius of 1.4 solar radii. Watching a video of a pulsar the size of its glow appears to be the same as the star next to it with the exception of pulsing. It does not appear to be a narrow beam of radiation but rather the same as the star next to it, but in brief flashes. The description of a pulsar's narrow beam I do not see on observation.
I was trying to understand if relativistic rotation speeds could cause redshift and was thinking how fast these Pulsars have to rotate. For the crab pulsar, The 1.4 R radius and rotation speed of 33 per second would imply : 695,000,000 M x 2 x 3.14 x 33 rotations/s = 144,031,800,000 m/s Is that really the implied rotational velocity, or am I missing something? That is over 40 x the speed of light so I must be wrong, to be rotating at the speed of light since it is linear relationship, the radius would have to reduce by a factor of 40. To reduce the radius by a factor of 40 implies increase of density on the order of 40^3(since volume is proportional to r^3) Then the density becomes impossible by their own models, and exotic matter like neutron stars are required to explain how an object could be this dense.
From the pulsar, EMR is in bursts rather than the usual continuous light. Is it possible to have anything like a semi-conductor in plasma physics? i.e. as it spins it changes from conductor to non-conductor? I think if the stars and pulsars are connected electrically, the period when the pulsar goes dark, something else should brighten, given the short periods it would be difficult to detect especially if it were redistributed evenly to nearby connected stars.
Is it uniform?...I would not expect currents to be constant.
The scientists have told us for a long time the CBMR is uniform, when they found irregularities they were explained by quantum fluctuations in the inflation field. Right, you believe its all uniform don't you Sparky, are you saying they are wrong? shock
Looking at the holes in the radiation that are not supposed to be there is really interesting. When we presume the light is 13 billion light years away small variances are overlooked due to the scale, if the origin were interstellar the variances would represent larger discrepancies and when investigated could shed light on the true origins of the CBMR.
If Arp's theory could be shown true, it would indicate highly red-shifted matter would be birthing galaxies signifying that all around is birth, not doom and gloom. If the CBMR's origin is not the universe's beginning the big bang theory's only real evidence would be removed.