Difference between Euclidean and Fractional Euclidean Geomet

[Aliuar]

When the spatial domain intersects the value domain at a point, this is called reality. When the spatial domain does not intersect a value at a point, this is called the false reality. False reality is not evil. The simple reversal of the false makes the intersection true. But if matter is value, then by making a change we make one space true while another false. If one considers space only restricted to the value distribution, then science is no longer considered to study posssibility space, but only as value space, which is a fractional euclidean geometry. But if we go beyond single points, and create geometry, we may consider space, cut up in different fractional Euclidean spaces, but, the fact that we can enumerate possibility, does not forgo our need to observe the actual distributed values, and how those values intersect Euclidean geometry. So reality is really it seems the domain of science, as science will attempt to determine how possibility becomes reality.

This is not to restrict the choices we actually do have. And the truth is, there are many curves of possibilities such as you standing in the center of a circle, looking out around you in the world, seeing many distances with no values, through which you may move other values to, such as yourself, to accomplish things. In other words, don't let science kill your dreams. The truth is, science is supposed to free us from our limitations by better respecting the power of our imagination within those limitations, in as much as we can move the values around.

Sorry I just have had a lot of really bad experiences with people lately ignoring the intersection between postulation and study of geometry, mathematics and art, and general descriptive theories, to the actuality of moving values such as those in the liquid of this tea I'm holding, as I imagine the actuality of the object as not just values but their distributions.

It seems clear to me that we must unite the fields of description with the fields of practice, to better enable ourselves to change. That is why I wish to unite chemistry with biology, with math, with a computer program specifically to better manipulate the possibilities available at a value distribution, by seeing "paths" that do not exist as values, but as possible opportunities.

I am studying many books... and hope to see these fields united under a calculus of representation. The intersection between the possibility plane and the value plane.