NASA asking for new studies on current solar minimum

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
User avatar
solrey
Posts: 631
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:54 pm

NASA asking for new studies on current solar minimum

Unread post by solrey » Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:55 am

Seems there are quite a few details about the current solar minimum that are confusing the scientists stuck on the fusion model. As they say, 'from crisis comes opportunity'.
Perhaps this could be a prime moment to solidly prove the Electric Sun model, while they're scratching their heads looking for answers.
Here's an official notice from NASA asking for information to help them figure out what's up with this prolonged minimum.

http://nspires.nasaprs.com/external/vie ... 0CCMSC.pdf
B.9 CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE MINIMUM OF SOLAR CYCLE 24
Clarified March 10, 2009: All references to "Solar Cycle 23" have
been updated to "Solar Cycle 24." Reference in Section 1 to "Solar
Cycle 22" has been updated to "Solar Cycle 23."
1. Scope of Program
In 2009, we are in the midst of the minimum of solar activity that marks the end of Solar
Cycle 24. As this cycle comes to an end we are recognizing, in retrospect, that the Sun
has been extraordinarily quiet during this particular Solar Cycle minimum. This is
evidenced in records of both solar activity and the response to it of the terrestrial space
environment. For example:
Causes – Solar output
• Lowest sustained solar radio flux since the F 10.7 proxy was created in 1947;
• Solar wind global pressure the lowest observed since the beginning of the Space
age;
• Unusually high tilt angle of the solar dipole throughout the current solar
minimum;
• Solar wind magnetic field 36% weaker than during the minimum of Solar Cycle
23;
• Effectively no sunspots;
• The absence of a classical quiescent equatorial streamer belt; and
• Cosmic rays at near record-high levels.
Consequences
• With the exception of 1934, 2008 had more instances of 3-hr periods with Kp=0
than any other year since the creation of the index in 1932;
• Cold contracted ionosphere and upper atmosphere; and
• Remarkably persistent recurrent geomagnetic activity.
Thus, we have an unprecedented opportunity to characterize the quiet/background state of
the heliosphere when the solar source function is as close to the ground state as it has
been in the modern era.
NASA’s Heliophysics Division wishes to facilitate study of this special period. This
ROSES element thus solicits proposals to study the Causes and Consequences of the
Minimum of Solar Cycle 24 (CCMSC). Proposals are encouraged that take advantage of
this opportunity with studies of domains ranging from the center of the Sun through
terrestrial and planetary space environments to the boundary of the heliosphere. High
priority will be given to studies addressing the interaction between various regimes.
Taking maximum advantage of this opportunity will require interaction between
specialists in different regimes. Selected Principal Investigators will have responsibilities
B.9-1
for both their own specific research and for participation in a yearly workshop where all
the CCMSC investigators will be brought together to explore the implications of their
own work for other regions. Proposals should address both of these responsibilities.
2. Programmatic Information
2.1 Budget Information
The Heliophysics Division has identified a total of $4.5M for support of this opportunity,
available over a three-year period. We thus expect annual funding of $1.5M to be
available for support CCMSC investigations. This is a one time only solicitation.
2.2 Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated according to the criteria specified in section C.2 of the NASA
Guidebook for Proposers. These criteria are intrinsic merit, relevance to NASA’s
objectives, and cost realism/reasonableness.
The determination of a proposal’s relevance shall include the contribution of the
proposed investigation to understanding the causes and/or consequences of the very low
solar activity minimum of Solar Cycle 24, including also the degree to which it addresses
the interaction between various regimes.
2.3 Education and Public Outreach Opportunities
NASA policy strongly encourages participation in Education and Public Outreach (E/PO)
activities by members of the science community. You may be eligible to propose a
supplemental Education or Outreach effort if your research proposal is selected for
award. The research award must have more than 15 months remaining at the time of
submission of the supplement proposal. For additional details concerning the submission
of Outreach or Education supplement proposals, please see Supplemental Outreach
Awards for ROSES Investigators (Appendix E.5) and Supplemental Education Awards
for ROSES Investigators (Appendix E.6).
3. Summary of Key Information
Expected annual program budget $1.5 M
for new awards
Number of new awards pending 10 – 15
adequate proposals of merit
Maximum duration of awards 3 years
Due date for Notice of Intent to April 17, 2009
propose (NOI)
Due date for proposals June 5, 2009
Planning date for start of 6 months after proposal due date.
investigation
B.9-2
Page limit for the central Science- 15 pp; See also Chapter 2 of the 2009 Guidebook
Technical-Management section for Proposers.
of proposal
Relevance This program is relevant to the heliophysics
strategic goals and subgoals in NASA’s Strategic
Plan; see Table 1 and the references therein.
Proposals that are relevant to this program are, by
definition, relevant to NASA.
General information and See the ROSES Summary of Solicitation.
overview of this solicitation
Detailed instructions for the See the 2009 NASA Guidebook for Proposers at
preparation and submission of http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/nragui
proposals debook/.
Submission medium Electronic proposal submission is required; no
hard copy is required or permitted. See also
Section IV of the ROSES Summary of Solicitation
and Chapter 3 of the 2009 NASA Guidebook for
Proposers.
Web site for submission of http://nspires.nasaprs.com/ (help desk available at
proposal via NSPIRES nspires-help@nasaprs.com or (202) 479-9376)
Web site for submission of http://grants.gov (help desk available at
support@grants.gov or (800) 518-4726)
proposal via Grants.gov
Funding opportunity number for NNH09ZDA001N-CCMSC
downloading an application
package from Grants.gov
NASA point of contact Dr. Mary Mellott
concerning this program Heliophysics Division
Science Mission Directorate
NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001
Telephone: (202) 358-0893
E-mail: Mary.M.Mellott@nasa.gov
B.9-3
Maybe the 'Thunderbolts project' could co-ordinate and produce a march madness slam dunk of a paper to get the Electric Sun model recognized.
“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality"
Nikola Tesla

seasmith
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: NASA asking for new studies on current solar minimum

Unread post by seasmith » Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:46 am

Image

Deep Solar Minimum 04.01.2009
A 12-year low in solar "irradiance": Careful measurements by several NASA spacecraft show that the sun's brightness has dropped by 0.02% at visible wavelengths and a whopping 6% at extreme UV wavelengths since the solar minimum of 1996. These changes are not enough to reverse the course of global warming, but there are some other, noticeable side-effects: Earth's upper atmosphere is heated less by the sun and it is therefore less "puffed up.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009 ... ist1066595

seasmith
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: NASA asking for new studies on current solar minimum

Unread post by seasmith » Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:50 am

~
&
A 55-year low in solar radio emissions

User avatar
The Great Dog
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:58 pm

Re: NASA asking for new studies on current solar minimum

Unread post by The Great Dog » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:30 pm

The Great Dog believes that there have been too few cycle observations for anyone to conclude that something is "low" or "high." These may be simple variances that occur due to unknown influences.

The "Electric Sun" is a theory in its infancy. It requires more fermentation before it is heady enough to compete with NASA's strong drink.
There are no other dogs but The Great Dog

User avatar
solrey
Posts: 631
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:54 pm

Re: NASA asking for new studies on current solar minimum

Unread post by solrey » Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:58 am

Great Dog. I agree with the concept of having your act together, but it seems that they mostly do based on Don Scotts presentation to NASA recently. http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/descott.htm

What NASA is offering are research grants. All that's necessary at this point is to basically write up a research grant proposal ( I'm familiar with the grant writing process having worked with several non-profit organizations ) and submit it via the channels NASA designated. Since Dr. Scott has a working relationship with at least a few people at NASA, this seems like a ripe moment to snatch some funding for specific research exploring the voracity of, and fine-tuning the electric sun model.

Personally, I wouldn't let an opportunity like this slip by, I'd be all over it.
“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality"
Nikola Tesla

User avatar
The Great Dog
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:58 pm

Re: NASA asking for new studies on current solar minimum

Unread post by The Great Dog » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:46 am

The Great Dog understands your need to howl with this pack. The Electric Sky is an excellent collection of new ideas based on the work of plasma and electrical investigators from the past, but it is cursory compared to the hundreds of years that have been invested by other packs. They have hunted the fields for a long time and their marks are everywhere. They will not allow their prey to be hunted by this pack.

The Great Dog has read the presentation by Dr. Scott and agrees with it. However, it is only one presentation to a small group of pack members at Goddard and it will require a more rigorous theoretical development. Undoubtedly, new smells will eventually cover those already on the trees, but the old pack will have to die first.
There are no other dogs but The Great Dog

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests