{"id":2948,"date":"2011-10-11T11:35:40","date_gmt":"2011-10-11T18:35:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/?p=2948"},"modified":"2011-10-15T05:03:36","modified_gmt":"2011-10-15T12:03:36","slug":"a-nobel-prize-for-the-dark-side","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/2011\/10\/11\/a-nobel-prize-for-the-dark-side\/","title":{"rendered":"A Nobel Prize for the Dark Side"},"content":{"rendered":"

“Science today is about getting some results, framing those results in an attention-grabbing media release and basking in the glory.” \u2014Kerry Cue, Canberra Times, 5 October 2011<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On October 4, 2011 the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to three astrophysicists for\u00a0\u201cTHE ACCELERATING UNIVERSE<\/strong>.\u201d\u00a0Prof. Perlmutter of the University of California, Berkeley, has been awarded half the 10m Swedish krona (US$1,456,000 or \u00a3940,000) prize, with Prof. Schmidt of the Australian National University and Prof. Riess of Johns Hopkins University’s Space Telescope Science Institute sharing the other half. The notion of an accelerating expansion of the universe is based on observation of supernovae at high redshift, known as\u00a0The High-Z SN Search<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Saul

Saul Perlmutter pictured with a view of the supernova 1987a in the background. Photo: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory<\/p><\/div>\n

\"Brian

Brian Schmidt of the Australian National University. Photo by Belinda Pratten.<\/p><\/div>\n

However, accelerating expansion requires a mysterious source of energy in space acting against gravity, dubbed \u201cdark energy.\u201d Calculations show that the energy required is equivalent to 73% of the total mass-energy of the universe! Historians will look back at science today with disbelief and amusement at the \u2018science\u2019 of today. Following equally mysterious \u2018black holes\u2019 and \u2018dark matter,\u2019 if we continue to discover darkness at the present rate we shall soon know nothing!<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe present boastfulness of the expounders and the gullibility of the listeners alike violate that critical spirit which is supposedly the hallmark of science.\u201d
\n\u2014Jacques Barzun, Science: the glorious entertainment<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"Dr.

Dr. Tamara Davis<\/p><\/div>\n

I attended a public lecture recently on\u00a0\u201cCosmological Confusion… revealing the common misconceptions about the big bang, the expansion of the universe and cosmic horizons<\/strong>,\u201d\u00a0presented at the Australian National University by an award winning Australian astrophysicist, Dr. Tamara Davis.<\/p>\n

The particular interests of Dr. Davis are the mysteries posed by \u2018dark matter\u2019 and \u2018dark energy,\u2019 hence the title of this piece. The theatre was packed and the speaker animated like an excited schoolchild who has done her homework and is proud to show the class. Her first question to the packed hall was, \u201cHow many in the audience have done some physics?\u201d It seemed the majority had. So it was depressing to listen to the questions throughout the performance and recognize that the noted cultural historian Jacques Barzun was right. Also, Halton Arp\u2019s appraisal of the effect of modern education seemed fitting:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cIf you take a highly intelligent person and give them the best possible, elite education, then you will most likely wind up with an academic who is completely impervious to reality.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Carl Linnaeus in 1758 showed characteristic academic hubris and anthropocentrism when he named our species Homo sapiens sapiens (\u201cSapiens\u201d is Latin for “wise man” or ” knowing man”). But it is questionable, as a recent (18th August) correspondent to Nature wrote, whether we\u00a0\u201cmerit a single \u2018sapiens,\u2019 let alone the two we now bear<\/em>.\u201d\u00a0To begin, big bang cosmology dismisses the physics principle of no creation from nothing. It then proceeds with the falsehood that Hubble discovered the expansion of the universe. He didn\u2019t, he found the\u00a0apparent<\/em>\u00a0redshift\/distance relationship (actually a redshift\/luminosity relationship), which to his death he did not feel was due to an expanding universe.<\/p>\n

This misrepresentation is followed by the false assumption that the evolution of an expanding universe can be deduced from Einstein\u2019s unphysical theory of gravity, which combines two distinct concepts, space and time, into some \u2018thing\u2019 with four dimensions called \u201cthe fabric of space-time.\u201d I should like to know what this \u201cfabric\u201d is made from and how matter can be made to shape it? Space is the concept of the relationship between objects in three orthogonal dimensions only. Time is the concept of the interval between events and has nothing to do with Einstein\u2019s physical clocks. Clearly time has no physical dimension. David Harriman says,\u00a0\u201cA concept detached from reality can be like a runaway train, destroying everything in its path<\/em>.\u201d\u00a0This is certainly true of Einstein\u2019s theories of relativity.<\/p>\n

Special relativity is no different to declaring that the apparent dwindling size of a departing train and the lower pitch of its whistle are due to a real shrinking of space on the train and slowing of its clocks. We know from experience that isn\u2019t true. The farce must eventually play out like the cartoon character walking off the edge of a cliff and not falling until the realization dawns that there is no support. But how long must we wait? We are swiftly approaching the centennial of the big bang. The suspense has become tedious and it is costing us dearly. Some people are getting angry.<\/p>\n

All of the \u2018dark\u2019 things in astronomy are artefacts of a crackpot cosmology. The \u2018dark energy\u2019 model of the universe demands that eventually all of the stars will disappear and there will be eternal darkness. In the words of Brian Schmidt,\u00a0\u201cThe future for the universe appears very bleak<\/em>.\u201d\u00a0He confirms my portrayal of big bang cosmology as \u201chope less.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Nobel Prize Committee had the opportunity to consider a number of rational arguments and evidence against an accelerating expanding universe:<\/p>\n

1. General Relativity (GR) is wrong \u2014 we don\u2019t understand gravity<\/strong>.\u00a0Brian Schmidt\u00a0mentions this possibility<\/a>\u00a0and labels it \u201cheretical.\u201d But GR must be wrong because space is not some \u2018thing\u2019 that can be warped mysteriously by the presence of matter. The math of GR explains nothing.<\/p>\n

2. Supernovae are not understood<\/strong>.\u00a0(Schmidt mentions this possibility too). This also should have been obvious because the theory is so complex and adjustable that it cannot predict anything. The model involving a sudden explosion of an accreting white dwarf is unverified and does not predict the link between peak luminosity and duration of supernovae type 1a \u2018standard candles\u2019 or the\u00a0complex bipolar pattern<\/a>\u00a0of their remnants.<\/p>\n

3. The universe is not expanding \u2014 Hubble was right<\/strong>.\u00a0If the redshift is not simply a Doppler effect, \u201cthe region observed appears as a small, homogeneous, but insignificant portion of a universe extended indefinitely both in space and time.\u201d<\/p>\n

4. Concerning intrinsic redshift<\/strong>, Halton Arp and his colleagues long ago proved that there is, as Hubble wrote,\u00a0\u201ca new principle of nature<\/em>,\u201d\u00a0to be discovered.<\/p>\n

5. There can be no \u2018dark energy\u2019 in \u2018empty space.\u2019<\/strong>\u00a0E=mc2<\/sup>\u00a0tells us that energy (E) is an intrinsic property of matter. There is no mysterious disembodied energy available to accelerate any \u2018thing\u2019 much less accelerate the concept of space.<\/p>\n

In failing to address these points the Nobel Committee perpetuates the\u00a0lack of progress in science<\/a>. We are paying untold billions of dollars for experiments meant to detect the phantoms springing endlessly from delusional theories. For example, gravitational wave telescopes are being built and continually refined in sensitivity to discover the imaginary \u201cripples in the fabric of space-time.\u201d The scientists might as well be medieval scholars theorizing about the number of angels that could dance on the head of a pin. By the end of 2010, the Large Hadron Collider has now cost more than US$10 billion searching for the\u00a0mythical Higgs boson<\/a>\u00a0that is supposed to cause all other particles to exhibit mass! Here, once again, E=mc2<\/sup>\u00a0shows that mass (m) is an intrinsic property of matter. It is futile to look elsewhere for a cause. In a scientific field, it is dangerous to rely on a single idea. The peril for cosmologists is clear. They have developed a monoculture; an urban myth called the big bang. Every surprising discovery must be force-fitted into the myth regardless of its absurdities. Scientists are presently so far \u2018through the looking glass\u2019 that the real universe we observe constitutes a mere 4% of their imaginary one.<\/p>\n

\"BB

The big bang universe where 96% of the universe is imaginary. The plasma universe has >99% of the universe in the form of plasma and <1% solids, liquids and neutral gases.<\/p><\/div>\n

The \u2018Alice in Wonderland\u2019 aspect of big bang cosmology is highlighted by the fact there\u00a0is\u00a0a competing \u2018plasma cosmology,\u2019 which is recognized by practical electrical engineers but unknown or dismissed by the mythmakers. Plasma cosmology deals with the dominant (>99%) form of matter in the visible universe. Plasma cosmology can demonstrate the formation and detailed rotation pattern of\u00a0spiral galaxies<\/a>, both by experiment and particle-in-cell computer simulation, using Maxwell\u2019s laws of electromagnetism alone. The puny force of gravity can be ignored! Plasma cosmology can also explain the activity in the centres of galaxies without resort to the mythical dark gravitational beast \u2014 the \u2018black hole.\u2019 The Electric Universe\u00a0goes further<\/a>\u00a0and also explains the gravitational effects observed at the center of the Milky Way in electrical terms. So much for the gravitational cosmology of the big bang! No invisible \u2018dark matter\u2019 need be conjured up and placed where needed to save the plasma model.<\/p>\n

The most profound and important demand we must make of astrophysicists is to justify their unawareness of this freely available \u2018second idea.\u2019\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2018Dark energy\u2019 is supposed to make up 73% of the universe. The evidence interpreted in this weird way comes from comparing the redshift distances of galaxies with the brightness of their supernovae type 1a, used as a \u2018standard candle.\u2019 It was found that the supernovae in highly redshifted galaxies are fainter than expected, indicating that they are further away than previously estimated. This, in turn, implied a startling accelerating expansion of the universe, according to the big bang model. It is like throwing a ball into the air and having it accelerate upwards. So a mysterious \u2018dark energy\u2019 was invented, which fills the vacuum and works against gravity. The Douglas Adams\u2019\u00a0\u201cInfinite Improbability generator\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>type of argument was called upon to produce this \u2018vacuum energy.\u2019 The language defining vacuum energy is revealing:\u00a0\u201cVacuum energy is an underlying background energy that exists in space even when the space is devoid of matter (free space). The concept of vacuum energy has been deduced from the concept of virtual particles, which is itself derived from the energy-time uncertainty principle.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0You may notice the absurdity of the concept, given that the vacuum contains no matter, \u2018background\u2019 or otherwise, yet it is supposed to contain energy. Adams was parodying Heisenberg\u2019s \u2018uncertainty principle\u2019 of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is merely a probabilistic\u00a0description\u00a0of what happens at the scale of subatomic particles without any real physical understanding of cause and effect.\u00a0Heisenberg was uncertain because he didn\u2019t know what he was talking about.<\/strong>\u00a0However, he was truthful when he wrote,\u00a0\u201cwe still lack some essential feature in our image of the structure of matter.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0The concept of \u2018virtual particles\u2019 winking in and out of existence defies the aforementioned first principle of physics,\u00a0\u201cThou shalt not magically materialize nor dematerialize matter.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0Calling that matter \u2018virtual\u2019 merely underscores its non-reality.<\/p>\n

Indeed, the \u2018discovery\u2019 of the acceleration of the expanding universe is an interpretation based on total ignorance of the\u00a0real nature of stars<\/a>\u00a0and the \u2018standard candle,\u2019 the supernova type 1a. A supernova type 1a is supposed to be due to a\u00a0hypothetical series of incredible events involving a white dwarf star<\/a>. But as I have shown, a supernova is simply an\u00a0electrical explosion of a star<\/a>\u00a0that draws its energy from a galactic circuit. The remarkable brilliance of a supernova, which can exceed that of its host galaxy for days or weeks, is explained by the kind of power transmission line failure that can also be seen occasionally on Earth. If such a circuit is suddenly opened, the electromagnetic energy stored in the extensive circuit is concentrated at the point where the circuit is broken, producing catastrophic arcing. Stars too can \u2018open their circuit\u2019 due to a plasma instability causing, for example, a magnetic \u2018pinch off\u2019 of the interstellar Birkeland current. The \u2018standard candle\u2019 effect and light curve is then simply due to the circuit parameters of galactic transmission lines, which power all stars.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Spectacular arcing at a 500,000 Volt circuit breaker.<\/p><\/div>\n

What of the fainter and more short-lived supernovae in highly-redshifted galaxies? Arp has shown that faint, highly-redshifted objects, like quasars, are intrinsically faint because of their youth and not their distance. Quasars are \u2018born\u2019 episodically from the nucleus of active galaxies. They initially move very fast along the spin axis away from their parent. As they mature they grow brighter and slow down, as if gaining in mass. Finally they evolve into companion galaxies. The decreasing quasar redshift occurs in discrete steps which points to a process whereby protons and electrons go through a number of small, quantized (resonant) increases in mass as the electrical stress and power density within the quasar increases. The charge required comes via an electrical \u2018umbilical cord,\u2019 in the form of the parent galaxies\u2019 nuclear jet. Based on Arp\u2019s discovery and the electric model of galaxies and stars, both stars and supernovae type 1a are naturally dimmer, and the supernovae more short-lived, in high-redshift galaxies than in low-redshift galaxies because of the smaller galactic power density and lower mass (energy) of all subatomic particles making up the former.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Arp's galactic 'family tree' showing birth of quasars with high-redshift (z) which decreases stepwise as they age and eventually form companion galaxies and progenitors of galactic clusters.<\/p><\/div>\n

But I don\u2019t expect a Nobel Prize for this sensible explanation. Otherwise I could meet the fate of the hapless student who created the \u2018Infinite Improbability generator\u2019 in Douglas Adams\u2019 wonderful\u00a0Hitchhiker\u2019s Guide to the Galaxy:<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong>\u201cwhen just after he was awarded the Galactic Institute\u2019s Prize for Extreme Cleverness he got lynched by a rampaging mob of respectable physicists who had finally realized that the one thing they really couldn\u2019t stand was a smart-ass.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The use of the title\u00a0The Dark Side<\/strong>\u00a0for Dr. Davis\u2019 cosmology talk seems unconsciously apposite. It was Joseph Campbell who said,\u00a0\u201cWe live our mythology.\u201d\u00a0<\/em>And George Lucas attributes the success of his Star Wars films, which rely on a degenerate, evil \u2018dark side,\u2019 to reading Campbell\u2019s books. The triumph of the big bang myth over common sense and logic supports Campbell\u2019s assessment. And the showbiz appeal of Lucas\u2019 mythic approach to storytelling is evident in the \u2018dark side\u2019 of cosmology. Scientists live their mythology too. Science\u2019s \u201ccosmic confusion\u201d is self-inflicted.<\/p>\n

The Electric Universe paradigm is distinguished by its interdisciplinary origin in\u00a0explaining\u00a0mythology by the use of forensic scientific techniques. It demands the lonely courage to give up familiar landmarks and beliefs. Sitting in the tame audience the other evening, listening to the professor of astrophysics, I was reminded of\u00a0The Galaxy Song from Monty Python<\/strong>, which ends with the painfully perceptive lines,\u00a0\u201cAnd pray there is intelligent life somewhere up in space, \u2018cause there\u2019s bugger-all down here on Earth!\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Wal Thornhill<\/p>\n

Now Available<\/span>\u00a0– Stars in an Electric Universe DVD<\/h1>\n

\"Stars<\/p>\n

This outstanding lecture delivered by Wallace Thornhill at the NPA 2011 Conference is now out on DVD!<\/p>\n

<\/strong>See our\u00a0resources page<\/a>\u00a0for more information<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Science today is about getting some results, framing those results in an attention-grabbing media release and basking in the glory.” \u2014Kerry Cue, Canberra Times, 5 October 2011 On October 4, 2011 the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to three astrophysicists for\u00a0\u201cTHE ACCELERATING UNIVERSE.\u201d\u00a0Prof. Perlmutter of the University of California,…<\/p>\n

Continue reading<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[342,26,52,56,55,348,344,347,85,349,350,345,163,346,308,343],"class_list":["post-2948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tblogs","tag-accelerating-expansion","tag-big-bang","tag-birkeland-current","tag-dark-energy","tag-dark-matter","tag-emc2","tag-expanding-universe","tag-intrinsic-redshift","tag-plasma-cosmology","tag-plasma-universe","tag-quasars","tag-redshiftdistance-relationship","tag-space-time","tag-standard-candle","tag-supernovae","tag-type-1a-supernovae"],"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"The Thunderbolts Project\u2122","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2948"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2948\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}