Are we even orbitting the galaxy/milky way

[johnm33]

"One of the reasons for the assumption of large amounts of Cryogenic (or Cold) Dark Matter (CDM) in the Gravity Model is to explain the observed rotation of galaxies. Astronomers have found that the individual stars in galaxies do not orbit the center of the galaxy in accordance with Kepler’s Laws for the motion of the planets. More specifically, the stars outside the central bulge of a galaxy all have approximately the same angular velocity, rotating more like a rigidly connected disk, but according to Kepler’s laws, the velocity should be less as distance from the center increases."
my bold.
I'm thinking that galaxies form in much the way that stars do, in the Z pinch, but of huge elongated Birkeland currents, and that at some point power surges passing in opposite directions cause a huge explosion which accelerates into a phase transition that drains the current back along its path in both directions feeding the material gathered over eons into a prolonged head on collision where the negative and positive streams wrap around one another eventually spinning off material in all directions, but mostly confined to the 'equatorial' plane immediately orthogonal to the axis of rotation where the collision is fiercest. The phase transition recasts the energy as primary charged particles and 'new' space/ether thus forming a huge vacuum of negative pressure in the Birkeland currents. Thus the spun off material is the result of the primary particles forming into accumulations of charge cast off with only the angular velocity imparted by the forces which seperated them from the plasmoid[?], then the spinning 'explosion' moves on. This gives the appearence of the cast off material being in orbit when no such process is occuring.
So I'm suggesting the sun, and most of the rest of the stars are merely moving away from their point of origin.
If you take a look here https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2016/06 ... r-coaster/ you'll see there's a suggestion that 'we' are part of the M54 sagittarius dwarf galaxy and one of the images there suggests we are still moving away from it's core. This may help to explain why we have encountered so many other 'stars' and captured them, like Neptune, Uranus, Saturn and Jupiter. What this may mean is that the sun is an old star which took a long time to build up mass whilst moving away from M54 then moved into the plane of the Milky Way galaxy and encountered objects of sufficient mass, or a powerful enough current flowing along its arm to be captured, but remains aligned with M54's plane and gyroscopically oriented orthogonally to it. This may indicate that Jupiter [and Venus] having so little tilt may also be native to M54?