Galaxies; They rotate there like they do here. News:

[gfellow]

This observation is important on so many levels.
Rotational behaviour of spiral galaxies right up against the event horizon (supposed 'Big Bang'), exhibit the same rotational velocity as those in our own local galactic group.
This means that hand-waving outlandish time dilation imaginings occurring near a 'big bang' are out the window: General time flow there, is the same as it is here.
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang ... y-rotates/

[BeAChooser]

Yes. Furthermore, the (mainstream?) article states “early on, galaxies shouldn’t be rotating and shouldn’t have disks, as chaotic initial motions should require significant amounts of time and many interactions in order to ‘settle down.’ … That thinking must now be revised, as disk-like galaxy REBELS-25, a young analogue of our Milky Way, is seen rotating in a settled-down state just 700 million years after the Big Bang."

Might that suggest that something other than gravity is responsible for the rotation ... perhaps … electromagnetism, like Anthony Peratt proposed (and demonstrated) back in the 1980s? Also, the article points out that galaxy MACS1149-JD1, at 530 million years after the Big Bang, the second most distant known, shows signs of internal rotation, too. And states that the stars in that galaxy formed as early as 280 million years after the Big Bang. All of this continues to cause HUGE problems for the gnome believers.