I will first reffer to the one in which the Nobel laureates, scientists Pound and Rebka, used a Helium bag and air to demonstrate that gravity produces the change in wavelength (one of the predictions of general relativity), as the emitter of the gamma ray was placed in helium 'to reduce scattering', and the detector was placed under the helium bag, in air.
Which in fact does not prove anything else except that Refraction, and by no means gravity, produces the shift in wavelength. Gravity only produces a need to add helium in order to produce a redshift from refraction. Because in the absence of refraction there is no redshift from gravity. And no Nobel prize for Pound and Rebka, who drilled the floors of their university for nothing.
It is ridiculous and also outrageous that these so called scientists received the Nobel Prize for that helium sham experiment, which can be debunked with relative ease as I will show, and that no scientist questioned its validity ever since (more precisely since 1960). Probably because no scientist knows or has not found out that refraction produces a redshift/blueshift:
'Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' (wikipedia)
And the redshifts they know, with the exception of the Doppler one, are pure pseudo-science. Because they confused the refractional redshift with gravitational redshift, and the last from expansion collapses as general relativity collapses (since its prediction of gravitational redshift is false).
And this is relatively easy to prove with just two simple formulas, which show that refraction absolutely causes a redshift/blueshift:
f=v/lambda, and v=c/n
The frequency of light remains constant during refraction, but the speed of light varies according to the index of refraction, therefore the wavelength (lambda) also varies according to the speed of light:
-if the speed of light increases, then the wavelength will also increase and a Refractional Redshift will occur.
-if the speed of light decreases, then the wavelength will also decrease and a Refractional Blueshift will occur.
So the great Harvard scientists, awarded with the great Nobel Prize, confused an effect of refraction with one of gravity ! And I don't know if they did it out of ignorance, or with good knowledge and bad intent, to collect the laurels, money and the Nobel Prize. It is still hard to believe that they could be so stupid and that they added helium 'to reduce scattering from air', but somehow left the detector in air, as shown in the picture with the experiment, instead of placing both in the same medium of helium to reduce both scattering and refraction.
And the very addition of helium should have raised an eyebrow, since Einstein's theory of relativity has nothing to do with helium or other gases. And in fact the experiment should have been done in a vacuum, or in space, but the geniuses from Harvard were too busy drilling holes in the walls of the university and filling them with helium that this did not occur to them.
Regardless of their motivation, their gravitational experiment is actually a refractional one, and its result has nothing to do with gravitaty, or relativity, but with refraction. And the fact that in the absence of refraction there is no redshift/blueshift caused by the gravitational potential shows that Einstein's theory is simply wrong and that it was falsified by the very experiment which allegedly confirmed it. The implications of this are enormous, in physics and especially in astronomy, where general relativity is used heavily in the standard cosmological model. Which from now on should be called the standard cosmoillogical model.
It is now obvious that the measured redshift of stars has absolutely nothing to do with their gravitational potential, but with their gaseous atmosphere that refracts the light in space, which leads to the increase of speed and of the wavelength, which is a refractional redshift and not a gravitational one. And, since all galaxies are made of stars, that is why all galaxies appear redshifted.
In conclusion, mainstream scientists falsely and erroneously attribute to gravity effects of refraction, such as bending light and changing wavelength, while de facto using refraction in most of their so-called gravitational experiments, and foolishly confusing the effects of refraction with those of gravitation. And this is not only said by me, but also by a scientist who worked at NASA as an astrophysicist, Dr Edward Dowdie, who showed that light does not bend at all outside the solar corona, which refracts it, a fact that contradicts the theory of Einstein who illogically puts all these effects of refraction onto gravity.
And the pseudo-scientists who claim GPS proves Einstein right because the gps signal gets blueshifted by the Earth's gravitational potential dont understand refraction either. The reason of the blueshift has nothing to do with gravity, but with the refraction from the earth's atmosphere, which changes the speed and wavelength of the radio wave. Doooh !
See also:
https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2023/1 ... s.html?m=1
https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2023/1 ... l.html?m=1
https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/0 ... d.html?m=1
