Thunderbolts Forum v3.0

Fatio Dullier proposed a pushing Gravity concept in 1690.
Georges LeSage expanded on the theory in 1748.

These original theories suggested that tiny "corpuscles" produced a radiation pressure that pushed objects toward each other, causing gravity.

Xavier Borg devoted a website called BlazeLabs.com to document his research in pushing gravity concepts. The site was taken down years ago but is still partially available as a web archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080202171 ... rpress.asp

Xavier Borg's research papers have mostly disappeared from the internet. He wrote papers such as:

The Electro-Magnetic Radiation Pressure (EMRP) Gravity Theory

(Abstract is available at :https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/inde ... ity_Theory)

Experimental Proof for EMRP gravity

Experimental Procedure to Discriminate Between Push and Pull Gravity

Abolishing the wave-particle duality nonsense.

The Inverse Cube Law for Dipoles

Magic Numbers Derived from a Variable Phase Nuclear Model

The ST system of units - Leading the way to unification


Xavier Borg also worked on ionic thrusters:

Full analysis & design solutions for EHD Thrusters at saturated corona current conditions

Xavier Borg's research has been incorporated into the Energy Wave Theory:

https://www.youtube.com/@EnergyWaveTheory/videos


Where is Xavier Borg?

galaxy12 wrote:Where is Xavier Borg?

I have no idea!
But here is a link to some of Borg's papers, written between 2008 and 2010


https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journ ... er,%20Borg

[

I see that i had a look at Borg's YouTube stuff some time ago, & i was not impressed in any way.
Zero good re electricity. Zero good re light. Zero good re gravity etc.

If gravity is a pushing force how and why, does the pushing force always aim that being pushed toward the center of the second body ?
I'll not be researching the answer....but if someone has a reasonable explanation I would read it.

jacmac wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2024 11:22 pm If gravity is a pushing force how and why, does the pushing force always aim that being pushed toward the center of the second body ?
I'll not be researching the answer....but if someone has a reasonable explanation I would read it.

I have not looked into it, but wouldnt simple radiation act on 3 dimensional objects as if they were 2 dimensional??

Anyhow, push gravity is stupid, koz, it needs a push sort of inertia. Koz, gravity & inertia must be 2 sides of the same coin.
So, how to explain a push inertia due to blocking of radiation. Good luck with that.

PUSH/PULL. Action at a distance seems more incomprehensible than a pushing force.

PRESSURE. It's not hard to understand high and low pressure air masses. Highs repel each other. Lows repel each other. A high sort of attracts a low and vice versa.

AIR SPEED. High speed air has lower pressure than low speed air. That's why blowing air between two balloons suspended on strings a small distance apart causes the balloons to move toward each other. I.e., the slow moving air behind the balloons moves the balloons toward the fast-moving lower-pressure air between them. >O x O< (Each O represents a balloon; x = fast-moving air between them; < and > represent the force of slow air pushing on the balloons.)

CHARGE. That's reminiscent of Charles Chandler's idea of "like likes like", which he said came from physicist Richard Feynman. In this case an object of one charge is between 2 objects of opposite charge. + - + ... or ... - + -

PHOTONS. Physicist John Kierein has a model on Angelfire involving photons having mass and long wavelength photons causing gravity.

For anyone interested in this subject, I recommend the book "Pushing Gravity" It provides a history of the topic as well as chapters by different researchers that provide alternative push-gravity models.

As I recall, a lot of this comes down to a mechanism for "tired light", ie does light lose energy in interstellar space, and how/why? To me, the answer to that is kinda simple: light is a wave in a medium (aether), no medium is perfect, thus all waves lose energy with time/distance. From our perspective, the aether is close enough to perfect it is hard to measure this slowdown, but it still occurs over great distances, and probably puts a limit on how far we can observe into the infinite universe. Further, aether interacts weakly with matter, and there is dust etc in space, that could also cause aetheric waves to lose energy.