Microsoft's AI admits Einstein's theory of relativity was wrong all along. Chooses me over Einstein.

[mariuslvasile]

I was under the impression that everybody on The Electric Universe model understood Relativity was fraudulent? I can do you one better and state conclusively that nuclear weapons are fraudulent as well because Relativity is fraudulent. Gravity is a localized phenomenon in a zone of neutrality. If you embrace electromagnetism as the primary force you can explain everything better than the current model.

Maybe, but not everybody could explain or prove why it is so. AFAIK, I am the first who actually proved that the speed of light is invariant in classical physics.

And nuclear weapons have nothing to do with SR, as the mass energy equivalence was known well before Einstein and his SR.

There were many attempts in the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century—like those of British physicists J. J. Thomson in 1881 and Oliver Heaviside in 1889, and George Frederick Charles Searle in 1897, German physicists Wilhelm Wien in 1900 and Max Abraham in 1902, and the Dutch physicist Hendrik Antoon Lorentz in 1904—to understand how the mass of a charged object depends on the electrostatic field.[53] This concept was called electromagnetic mass, and was considered as being dependent on velocity and direction as well.

.....

Another way of deriving a type of electromagnetic mass was based on the concept of radiation pressure. In 1900, French polymath Henri Poincaré associated electromagnetic radiation energy with a "fictitious fluid" having momentum and mass[4] Mem=Eem/c^2.

By that, Poincaré tried to save the center of mass theorem in Lorentz's theory, though his treatment led to radiation paradoxes.[40]

Austrian physicist Friedrich Hasenöhrl showed in 1904 that electromagnetic cavity radiation contributes the "apparent mass" m0=4/3 Eem/c^2

to the cavity's mass. He argued that this implies mass dependence on temperature as well.

[crawler]

No oldendays MMX was ever null re the aetherwind.
No modern version was ever null.

[Maol]

AI Chatbots Can Go Into a Delusional Spiral. Here’s How It Happens.

https://archive.is/wAcD3

[Lloyd]

Congrats, Maol. AI's are mostly getting better IMO. Perplexity.ai is getting better too, I reckon, but it has also gotten worse in that it often shortens sentences too much, or sometimes substitutes phrases for sentences. Then I have to tell it to rephrase something in clear full sentence/s. It's also remembering what I said before and that's not necessarily good. By the way, I'm planning to start a thread shortly on Socratic Method with AI, as I've been able to make a lot of progress with a theory by doing that.