Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light? If you have a personal favorite theory, that is in someway related to the Electric Universe, this is where it can be posted.
-
Atlas
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:32 pm
Unread post
by Atlas » Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:09 pm
The first part was kind of cool, like thanks for sharing how to make bowl-shaped magnets. The second half where he was shooting magnets through copper coil was kind of cringy, like baby's first electric experiment. I think the dude's series on bowl-shaped magnetic fields and their related substructures was mind-blowing. Everything he's done after those three videos has been disappointing. I think he reached the end of his inspiration and is reaching now.
We are never at home, we are always beyond. Fear, desire, hope, project us toward the future and steal from us the feeling and consideration of what is, to busy us with what will be, even when we shall no longer be.
-
archivus
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2019 3:58 pm
Unread post
by archivus » Tue Jan 28, 2020 11:33 pm
Atlas wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:09 pmshooting magnets through copper coil
I am probably misinterpreting what you are writting but the copper coils are simply a method to extract the energy generated between each push of each cone magnet. (at least in the begging of the video titled "over unity" )
The cone magnets push the smaller magnets through the central hole and the copper coils between each cone magnet are collecting the energy generated.
-
JP Michael
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:19 am
Unread post
by JP Michael » Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:09 am
Generation of electricity from magnetism, ie. 'Free' energy.
I question whether it will work on a large scale, but that will have to wait for a completed circuit prototype reactor.
I will also refrain on commenting about his source of inspiration for his technologies.
-
JP Michael
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:19 am
Unread post
by JP Michael » Sat Feb 01, 2020 1:04 pm
@archivus
Just want to thank you again for posting these. I think EU models would do well to incorporate many of LaPoint's discoveries.
-
kmcook
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:20 am
- Location: Northern Tasmania
Unread post
by kmcook » Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:45 am
Very interesting and a quality production.
But... I find the constant electronic music background very irritating.
-
JP Michael
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:19 am
Unread post
by JP Michael » Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:33 am
The main issue with LaPoint's thesis is the cause of the bowl fields in cosmic (or even atomic) environs.
It may be so that planetary, stellar and galactic magnetic fields are 'bowl-type' rather than the commonly supposed 'bar-magnet' type, but how does one theorise the cause for such magnetic geometry? It's not like there are iron bowl rims poking out the north and south poles of Earth or any other stellar body.
This is where LaPoint's theory falls down. He demonstrates the 'what' in the case of iron bowl magnetically shaped laboratory plasmas, but not the 'how' in bowl-less planetary, stellar or cosmic plasmas. Until he can demonstrate the same phenomenon naturally self-organising minus the magnetised iron bowls, one cannot say that bowl magnetism is the intrinsic form in nature.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
