by crawler » Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:00 am
tholden wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:28 amcrawler wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:17 pmHas Sansbury's 10 nanosecond @ 400 nanosecond light chopping experiment been replicated?
I think that the zero detection tells us more about the nature of his Pockel Cell rather than the nature of light.
Should mention also, the last part of the little steemit blog post linked above describes my own version of a Sansbury-type description of light as a sequence of bow waves created by streams of Sansbury's subtron particles being thrown off by energetic processes.
If I am right about this "redneck theory of light", then light coming to us from distant galaxies may be taking seconds and minutes to get here, and not millenia.
For sure there must be lots of experiments (that contradict standard science) hidden away to not rock the boat.
And some papers get past the gatekeepers (accidentally or on purpose) by showing that the contradiction can in fact be explained by STR or GTR by invoking (knowingly or non-knowingly) ridiculous versions of STR & GTR (eg Sagnac for GPS).
Sansbury i think mainly says that subtrons move much faster than c, & that the eye or detectors invent a photon moving at c after enough subtrons have done their work. Anyhow an electric dipole kind of explanation of gravity doesn't appeal to me.
I wonder if redshift is really a kind of redneckshift.
[quote=tholden post_id=388 time=1579480088 user_id=400][quote=crawler post_id=386 time=1579475859 user_id=30412]Has Sansbury's 10 nanosecond @ 400 nanosecond light chopping experiment been replicated?
I think that the zero detection tells us more about the nature of his Pockel Cell rather than the nature of light.[/quote]Should mention also, the last part of the little steemit blog post linked above describes my own version of a Sansbury-type description of light as a sequence of bow waves created by streams of Sansbury's subtron particles being thrown off by energetic processes.
If I am right about this "redneck theory of light", then light coming to us from distant galaxies may be taking seconds and minutes to get here, and not millenia.[/quote]For sure there must be lots of experiments (that contradict standard science) hidden away to not rock the boat.
And some papers get past the gatekeepers (accidentally or on purpose) by showing that the contradiction can in fact be explained by STR or GTR by invoking (knowingly or non-knowingly) ridiculous versions of STR & GTR (eg Sagnac for GPS).
Sansbury i think mainly says that subtrons move much faster than c, & that the eye or detectors invent a photon moving at c after enough subtrons have done their work. Anyhow an electric dipole kind of explanation of gravity doesn't appeal to me.
I wonder if redshift is really a kind of redneckshift.