Thunderbolts Forum v3.0

by **joabel1971** » Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:54 pm

Here's an A.I. simulation of what knot regions might look like along a twisted-pair Cosmic Web Conduit. The "X" marks are offset incorrectly - and potentially not at the right phase from each other - but my A.I. ran out of steam, so I'll try again later. Looks very much like a 3D representation of an AM radio wave.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WOvbY ... drive_link

by **joabel1971** » Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:51 pm

It's becoming clear that galaxies are simply the tighter regions of loosely-coupled, dual, twisted-pair Cosmic Web Conduits. I got the 1st picture from ASM Metals Handbook Vol 2, and the 2nd from the gallery on NRAO website.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O5BTDK ... drive_link
https://public.nrao.edu/wp-content/uplo ... w1841a.jpg
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p2qUB_ ... drive_link

by **joabel1971** » Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:23 pm

Wow, he just doesn't give up. I guess this forum allows distractive dissenters to take over threads. A shame.

by **Maol** » Thu Aug 28, 2025 8:10 am

Why didn't you post the image and post the link to the page with the information about the image? If you actually want share your ideas and your understanding of the subject it seems in everyone's best interest you would make the information as convenient and accessible as possible.

https://public.nrao.edu/news/nsf-vlba-p ... o-mystery/

by **joabel1971** » Thu Aug 28, 2025 5:47 am

So, I ran across this picture of an "up the barrel" angle of a jet coming out of a galaxy. Here is another example of what a Cosmic Web filament might look like when sending radio waves toward Earth.

https://public.nrao.edu/wp-content/upl ... 68x480.jpg

by **joabel1971** » Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:37 am

Apparently, he keeps trying. But alas, he already lost - just every other distraction-bot.

by **Maol** » Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:54 am

joabel1971 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 27, 2025 5:34 pm This thread is for those who are interested in testing a novel way to wrap an array of loop antennas for radio astronomy. If you just want to post silly pictures that can be found on Twitter or Facebook - then go to Twitter or Facebook and post to your heart's content. Maol has been marked as a "Foe", so I do not see his nonsense anymore.

joabel1971 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 27, 2025 5:03 pm I think it is you who needs to "Chill out". You assume too much in your pointed questions. Go find someone else to bully around.

And, I ask that you don't post here anymore.

Pointed questions seek pointed answers.

Did you really think I didn't know it was Messier 51 when your image of it in your link was clearly identified?

Why did you delete the links to your pictures? I was going to try to post an image of the (prototype?) cone you made by hosting a copy of it on a photo hosting site, since you can't seem to figure that out, but now picture gone ???

If you choose to assume a holier-than-thou attitude and you won't answer simple questions to provide basis for a dialog, fine by me. Retreat to your safe place and carry on. I hope someone else engages you and something fruitful evolves from your effort.

Somebody else carry this on until we see some data or an image from a working model of this novel antenna design.

by **joabel1971** » Wed Aug 27, 2025 5:34 pm

This thread is for those who are interested in testing a novel way to wrap an array of loop antennas for radio astronomy. If you just want to post silly pictures that can be found on Twitter or Facebook - then go to Twitter or Facebook and post to your heart's content. Maol has been marked as a "Foe", so I do not see his nonsense anymore.

by **joabel1971** » Wed Aug 27, 2025 5:03 pm

I think it is you who needs to "Chill out". You assume too much in your pointed questions. Go find someone else to bully around.

And, I ask that you don't post here anymore.

by **Maol** » Wed Aug 27, 2025 5:08 am

joabel1971 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 27, 2025 2:47 am Therefore, since this design is currently being considered as an array of 1700 condensed loop-antennas - it will be tested as such. NRAO is much more interested in array telescopes - then single element telescopes.

Are you saying you are making a larger working model? Have you tested and proved the concept with a prototype?

by **joabel1971** » Wed Aug 27, 2025 2:47 am

Therefore, since this design is currently being considered as an array of 1700 condensed loop-antennas - it will be tested as such. NRAO is much more interested in array telescopes - then single element telescopes.

by **joabel1971** » Wed Aug 27, 2025 2:41 am

And that poster would be incorrect, since it is what is conventionally known as Messier 51 (Whirlpool Galaxy). We have no way of imaging our own neighborhood in that way since we are part of it. But, whether or not the Milky Way actually looks like a 2D spiral with a bulge - is based on assumptions of how distant galaxies are shaped and how those shapes have been mentally projected back to our own neighborhood. If our instrumentation is wrong - we don't really know for sure.

by **Maol** » Tue Aug 26, 2025 6:38 pm

Looks like home. I have a large poster of that image on the wall in my workshop with a "you are here" arrow on it.

by **joabel1971** » Tue Aug 26, 2025 5:09 pm

Maol wrote: ↑Tue Aug 26, 2025 4:00 pm
1. The pictures are available when your links here are opened in new tabs, but I can't post them as pictures either, so it must have something do do with where or in what format they are stored or hosted on the web.

My pictures are typically stored & shared .jpg files - with an occasional .png.

2. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kb9yly ... drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nNGki8 ... drive_link

These links don't lead anywhere.

2. I don't understand antenna design well enough to discuss it, but are you saying the cone shape provides sensitivity in a directional or beam-like focus, similar in function as a parabolic sound reflector focuses microphone reception, and the interleaved cone coil geometry results in enhanced sensitivity at the multiple resonant peaks as shown in the graph?

The cone has the exclusive property of having a base circumference equal to the slant height - resulting in a constant base angle of 80.842 degrees. And, it's NOT holding a cone-shaped wire antenna - it's holding a series of loop antennas separated by capacitance of adjacent wrap (patent 512,340). So, unlike a typical 1-wire cone antenna that only has 1 wirelength resonant frequency - each wrap will resonate under it's own wirelength & LC conditions. Also, if each loop-antenna resonates with a portion of an incoming signal - and that wavelength extends in all directions - there is only one point that all the portions terminate with the same phase - the apex of the cone. This is logically where a near-field collector could be placed.

3. The graph with resonant peaks reminds me of the product of software I use which calculates specific frequencies and dB suppression for modeling geometry of muffler designs for IC engines.

That's nice.

4. What would you expect to see "looking up the barrel of plasma conduits" ?

I already posted a picture of this - but If my understanding of plasma cosmology is accurate & if the Cosmic Web is made from CHHIP (cold, hydrogen, highly ionized plasma) instead of dark matter - then I would expect to see the following type of structure by looking "up-the-barrel" of a twisted-pair Cosmic Web filament. You might recognize it: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PXzj1z ... sp=sharing

by **Maol** » Tue Aug 26, 2025 4:00 pm

The pictures are available when your links here are opened in new tabs, but I can't post them as pictures either, so it must have something do do with where or in what format they are stored or hosted on the web.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kb9yly ... drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nNGki8 ... drive_link

I don't understand antenna design well enough to discuss it, but are you saying the cone shape provides sensitivity in a directional or beam-like focus, similar in function as a parabolic sound reflector focuses microphone reception, and the interleaved cone coil geometry results in enhanced sensitivity at the multiple resonant peaks as shown in the graph?

The graph with resonant peaks reminds me of the product of software I use which calculates specific frequencies and dB suppression for modeling geometry of muffler designs for IC engines.

What would you expect to see "looking up the barrel of plasma conduits" ?

Thunderbolts Forum v3.0

Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..

Re: Novel Radio Telescope design - for looking "up the barrel" of plasma conduits & using patent 512,340..