Are you just responding to my summarized comment, or did you watch the part of the video where they break it down?
I was mostly responding to your comments. However, the video is almost 3 hours long and I did not have time for it all. I did go over some of it, and found it interesting.
With regard to the temperature of the corona it was somewhat unclear; it must be remembered that the measurements are made with spectrometers and are real. However, when your talking about plasmas and electric discharges temperature becomes somewhat meaningless or at least deceiving. For example a lightning bolt on Earth can be over 50,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
With regard to the rest of the video:
There are some big differences between what they discussed and the Electric Sun model (as in Scott or Thornhill's work).
A few examples: they did entertain that planets are formed by fissioning of a star or gas giant, but they rejected the idea that Saturn could have been captured. Also, it seems that they thought that the Earth and Venus were ejected from the Sun and settled in their present orbits. That of course, is completely at odds with the EU. I could not determine what they think is the power source of the Sun, it seemed from what I viewed that they were accepting of a nuclear fusion dynamo at the core, however I may have missed any contrary speculations. And they seemed to derive a stellar evolution reflected in the H-R diagram which is completely contrary to the Electric Universe.
I did like that they asserted that so called planetary discs around stars, are not solar systems in the early formation stage, but were rather expulsion discs. That was one of Wal Thornhill's main points.
Some points were very familiar to EU and others very different.
[quote]Are you just responding to my summarized comment, or did you watch the part of the video where they break it down?[/quote]I was mostly responding to your comments. However, the video is almost 3 hours long and I did not have time for it all. I did go over some of it, and found it interesting.
With regard to the temperature of the corona it was somewhat unclear; it must be remembered that the measurements are made with spectrometers and are real. However, when your talking about plasmas and electric discharges temperature becomes somewhat meaningless or at least deceiving. For example a lightning bolt on Earth can be over 50,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
With regard to the rest of the video:
There are some big differences between what they discussed and the Electric Sun model (as in Scott or Thornhill's work).
A few examples: they did entertain that planets are formed by fissioning of a star or gas giant, but they rejected the idea that Saturn could have been captured. Also, it seems that they thought that the Earth and Venus were ejected from the Sun and settled in their present orbits. That of course, is completely at odds with the EU. I could not determine what they think is the power source of the Sun, it seemed from what I viewed that they were accepting of a nuclear fusion dynamo at the core, however I may have missed any contrary speculations. And they seemed to derive a stellar evolution reflected in the H-R diagram which is completely contrary to the Electric Universe.
I did like that they asserted that so called planetary discs around stars, are not solar systems in the early formation stage, but were rather expulsion discs. That was one of Wal Thornhill's main points.
Some points were very familiar to EU and others very different.