The lucrative DM beat goes on …

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The lucrative DM beat goes on …

Re: The lucrative DM beat goes on …

by BeAChooser » Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:27 am

perpetual motion wrote: Tue Sep 24, 2024 5:27 am Black holes could be frozen stars, claims study
Why not start a new thread about frozen stars since the OP of this one doesn't even mention blackholes?

Re: The lucrative DM beat goes on …

by perpetual motion » Tue Sep 24, 2024 5:27 am

Einstein’s theory challenged: Black holes could be frozen stars, claims study :oops:

Many paradoxes linked to black holes would be resolved, if this theory were confirmed. However, it would challenge Einstein’s theory.

Rupendra Brahambhatt
Einsteins theory challenged: Black holes could be frozen stars, claims study
Black holes are one of those rare entities that defy the rules of science and are associated with many paradoxes that seem unresolvable. However, a new study proposes a theory that could change everything we know about black holes.

The study suggests that black holes are actually frozen stars, theoretical remnants of stars that have cooled down and no longer emit light or heat. Also called black dwarfs, frozen stars represent the final stage of a star’s life cycle.

Generally, scientists believe that stars take trillions of years to reach the black dwarf stage. As our universe is only 13.7 billion years old, it doesn’t have any frozen stars yet.

However, in the new study, the researchers conducted a detailed analysis of the similarities between frozen stars and black holes and discovered that their theory solves many of the paradoxes linked to the traditional black hole model.

The problem with the current black hole model

When it comes to black holes, the science community has been following what Albert Einstein stated in his theory of general relativity in 1915.

According to Einstein, there are two prime features of a black hole. First, it contains a point of infinite density at its center, which is referred to as singularity. Second, a black hole has an event horizon – a boundary that doesn’t allow anything to escape, not even light.

While this theory is widely accepted, it has also faced some big challenges. For instance, real-world observation suggests that infinities aren’t meant to exist in nature, and this is why everything is considered finite in physics.

Another contradiction arises from Stephen Hawking’s radiation paradox which suggests that black holes can emit radiation and slowly lose mass over time, which eventually leads to their complete evaporation. But how is this possible, since Einstein proposed that nothing escapes a black hole?

Also, if a black hole vaporizes, then the matter that formed the black hole is destroyed. However, this violates the law of conservation of information, which states that information, like matter, can neither be created nor destroyed. Information conservation also forms the basis of quantum mechanics.

However, according to the study authors, all these paradoxes are resolved when black holes are considered frozen stars — objects that lack both singularity and event horizon.

Do black holes make sense as frozen stars?

In their study, the researchers demonstrate that the theoretical values of the thermodynamic properties, such as entropy and thermal radiation, for black holes are similar to those of frozen stars.

“Frozen stars are a type of black hole mimickers: ultracompact, astrophysical objects that are free of singularities, lack a horizon, but yet can mimic all of the observable properties of black holes,” Ramy Brustein, first study author and a physics professor at Ben-Gurion University in Israel, told Live Science.

So, if black holes are frozen stars, this means they don’t have a point of infinite density or singularity. This condition suggests that they follow the same rules related to finiteness as real-world objects.

Plus, the lack of an event horizon suggests that radiations and particles can escape their boundary, which is in alignment with what Hawking stated about the emission of light from black holes.

“We have shown how frozen stars behave as (nearly) perfect absorbers although lacking a horizon and act as a source of gravitational waves. Moreover, they source the same external geometry as that of a conventional model of black holes and reproduce their conventional thermodynamic properties,” Brustein said.

However, the study has various limitations as well. For instance, black dwarfs are believed to have an internal structure whereas this is not expected in the case of black holes.

Also, there’s no experimental evidence that confirms that black holes are indeed frozen stars. Therefore, further research is required to validate this hypothesis.

The study is published in the journal Physical Review D.

I can not believe that they found another billion dollar asset! Maybe,maybe not.

Re: The lucrative DM beat goes on …

by Lloyd » Tue Sep 17, 2024 3:42 pm

Do you have time to do an interview over a few days or weeks?

Re: The lucrative DM beat goes on …

by Quick_Trad3s » Mon Sep 16, 2024 1:08 am

Our work is built around the idea that plasma and electromagnetism are fundamental in explaining galactic behavior, directly challenging the dark matter hypothesis. One of our core equations comes from the expansion of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) principles into a cosmological framework. The following is an advanced formula we've developed:

**F_grav + F_em = ∇(p + B²/2μ₀) + ρ_e(E + v × B)**

Where:

- **F_grav** represents gravitational forces,
- **F_em** is the electromagnetic force,
- **B** is the magnetic field,
- **μ₀** is the vacuum permeability,
- **ρ_e** is the charge density, and
- **E** is the electric field.

In this context, the equation shows how plasma and electromagnetic fields influence galactic rotations and explain gravitational anomalies attributed to dark matter.

By incorporating the contribution of plasma currents and magnetic reconnection events, this formula predicts rotational curves similar to those observed in galaxies, without needing exotic dark matter particles. Additionally, we integrate Birkeland currents into this framework, which are large-scale electric currents that flow along magnetic field lines. These currents significantly impact galactic dynamics and gravitational lensing, which further questions the need for dark matter.

This formulation is testable, as it predicts specific observable electromagnetic signatures in galactic and intergalactic plasmas that can be measured. This quantitative framework offers a more grounded, observable approach to understanding cosmic phenomena than relying on unseen dark matter.

Furthermore, our analysis extends into studying plasmoid formations through this lens, where we delve into:

**τ_p = (a_0 I_p) / (μ₀)^1/2**

Where:

- **τ_p** represents the plasmoid lifetime,
- **a_0** is the cross-sectional radius of the plasmoid,
- **I_p** is the plasmoid current, and
- **μ₀** remains the vacuum permeability constant.

This provides insights into energy distribution within galaxies and cosmic structures, explaining not only rotational dynamics but also how mass is structured on cosmic scales. We've confirmed the behavior of these models through simulations, which align with astronomical observations, offering a robust alternative to dark matter.

By refining our understanding of how electric currents and magnetic fields guide the formation and behavior of cosmic structures, our models present quantifiable, predictive power that challenges the dark matter paradigm head-on. If anyone wants to question my math feel free to ask 😎

The lucrative DM beat goes on …

by BeAChooser » Fri Sep 13, 2024 3:54 am

https://phys.org/news/2024-09-combinati ... 2hdma.html
Recently, the ATLAS collaboration searched for dark matter using the 139 fb-1 of proton-proton collision data accumulated during LHC's Run 2, within the 2HDM+a dark matter theoretical framework. The search utilized a variety of dark matter production processes and experimental signatures, including some not considered in traditional dark matter models.

… snip …

"This work is one of the largest projects in the search for new physics at the LHC, involving nearly 20 different analysis channels.

… snip …

Vu Ngoc Khanh, a postdoctoral researcher at Tsung-Dao Lee institute, stated, "Although we have not yet found dark matter particles at the LHC, compared to before the LHC's operation, we have put stringent constraints on the parameter space where dark matter might exist, including the mass of the dark matter particles and their interaction strengths with other particles, further narrowing the search scope."
Ah yes … the success of not finding anything.

But don’t worry, they’ve got plans to spend another 20 years lookin ... ON YOUR DIME. Here …
Tsung Dao Lee Fellow Li Shu, added, "So far, the data collected by the LHC only accounts for about 7% of the total data the experiment will record. The data that the LHC will generate over the next 20 years presents a tremendous opportunity to discover dark matter. Our past experiences have shown us that dark matter might be different from what we initially thought, which motivates us to use more innovative experimental methods and techniques in our search."
Meaning not only does dark matter give them long term job security … they still don’t have a clue what it is. Just saying …

Top