just some prototypical mainstream ad hominem arguments
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:50 pm
- MrAmsterdam
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:59 am
Re: just some prototypical mainstream ad hominem arguments
I'm still waiting for "a straightforward application of gravity" that can be seen here on earth with my own eyes in an empirical experiment.http://scientopia.org/blogs/galacticint ... -is-wrong/
Given that we're able to explain all the orbits in the solar system with a straightforward application of gravity, where's the problem that plasma cosmology is supposed to solve?
Oh great, now you give computer simulations and math as replacement for technical descriptions of empirical plasma experiments...What you've got, really, is a lot of nice sounding technical jargon that ultimately doesn't make clear what it is that they're really saying. In short, where's the math? If you're going to make quantitative predictions about where things are going, we need to know the equations that go along with your nice words.
Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. -Nikola Tesla -1934
-
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:58 pm
- Location: New Zealand
Re: just some prototypical mainstream ad hominem arguments
Nereid has found a new "nest" for the season by the looks ... how about grabbing her comment from this board where she/he states she/he does not believe in the Big Bang? ... throw that into the mix, should be fun
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests