For discussion of Electric Universe and Plasma Cosmology. The ideas and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of T-Bolts Group Inc or The Thunderbolts Project™
http://thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/phpBB3/
http://thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=411
Hollow Jupiter, hmmm.spark wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:35 am Wal Thornhill talks about repulsive gravity part of electric gravity in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvfFJiUWuDk
The gravity of a planet is calculated via Newtonian mechanics. Wall states mass is a variable dependent on charge, so the calculated density of planets is misleading, which then leads to the wrong guess of a planet's composition.hyrumpoint0 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:28 pmHollow Jupiter, hmmm.spark wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:35 am Wal Thornhill talks about repulsive gravity part of electric gravity in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvfFJiUWuDk
What's interesting to me, while watching that video, other than the hollow planet concept, is that NASA even got to Jupiter. Since their probe arrived there, they must have successfully calculated its distance, and they're using Newton's gravity equation, which requires the mass of the Sun and of Jupiter to calculate. The thing not needed to calculate is Jupiter's orbital period and that can be used to determine the force between the Sun and Jupiter, but we still need to know the mass of the planets (if Newton's gravity equation is valid).
But the EU gravity theory is completely different than what NASA used to calculate Jupiter's distance. So if the EU model of gravity is (more) correct, then NASA is either lying about getting to Jupiter, or they're lying about how far it is. Or, there's the ridiculously slim chance that both models of gravity will predict the same distance to Jupiter.
I'm not defending mainstream science, just trying to figure it out. I suspect they're lying about their space missions.
I think EU has sufficiently explained the condensation of matter through plasma currents and pinch points. Once condensed, then the force of "gravity" can produce its effects, possibly including orbits.dren wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:26 pm
The gravity of a planet is calculated via Newtonian mechanics. Wall states mass is a variable dependent on charge, so the calculated density of planets is misleading, which then leads to the wrong guess of a planet's composition.
Unless there is an inherent dipole in an atom, you run into the chicken vs egg argument with his theory. The way he explains it makes it sound like gravity is required to create the dipole which then creates the gravity. Perhaps it is done during sun/planet creation via Marklund Convection.
Good point, and I wasn't ducking anything. I'd assume (I don't know) that orbital observations along with radio signaling from satellites got them in the ballpark.hyrumpoint0 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 1:50 pmI think EU has sufficiently explained the condensation of matter through plasma currents and pinch points. Once condensed, then the force of "gravity" can produce its effects, possibly including orbits.dren wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:26 pm
The gravity of a planet is calculated via Newtonian mechanics. Wall states mass is a variable dependent on charge, so the calculated density of planets is misleading, which then leads to the wrong guess of a planet's composition.
Unless there is an inherent dipole in an atom, you run into the chicken vs egg argument with his theory. The way he explains it makes it sound like gravity is required to create the dipole which then creates the gravity. Perhaps it is done during sun/planet creation via Marklund Convection.
BUT, you dodged the most interesting question. I wonder if this was intentional? No matter, the most interesting question is: how does NASA navigate the solar system using their gravity equation which does not take into effect the charges of the planets and Sun???
The following article touches on this question, https://www.holoscience.com/wp/newtons- ... ar-system/, but neglects to give clues for an answer.
Okay, didn't mean to accuse you of being dodgy:)
The simplest answer is that the theory just works (at least at this scale).hyrumpoint0 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 1:50 pm how does NASA navigate the solar system using their gravity equation which does not take into effect the charges of the planets and Sun???
This question came up somewhere on the old forum. The navigation is done with several different factors one of which is Newtonian gravitation.how does NASA navigate the solar system using their gravity equation which does not take into effect the charges of the planets and Sun???