The absurdity of space-time curvature and geodesics

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.
mariuslvasile
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2024 3:57 am
Location: Romania
Contact:

The absurdity of space-time curvature and geodesics

Unread post by mariuslvasile » Tue Mar 19, 2024 1:09 am

Einstein's theory of gravity is based on the notion that space-time can curve, and uses geodesics to describe its curvature.

But space is not a physical object which can expand or bend. It is the lack there of. Attributing geodesics to space(time) makes no sense because a geodesic is, by definition, the shortest line between two points on a spherical or curved surface (Oxford def.)

Space has no surface, and time has no surface either, so space-time geodesics are a complete non-sense.

The notion of Geodesic comes from Geodesy, the science which studies earth's shape, which has a curved surface (Geo meaning Earth, obviously). It has nothing to do with space, which has no shape or surface. General relativity is based on a complete misuse and misunderstanding of the notion of geodesics. It is completelly illogical as it ignores the definition which requires a surface, which space obviously does not and cannot have.
Unless it is a physical object, like the solid sky firmament from the babble. Which is not what Einstein believed in, as he called it a book of childish superstitions.
Amen to that !

https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/0 ... g.html?m=1
The only way to unify quantum mechanics with general relativity is by throwing both at the recycle bin. Because they are both junk science.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests