Here’s yet another surprising JWST finding!

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.
BeAChooser
Posts: 1082
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Here’s yet another surprising JWST finding!

Unread post by BeAChooser » Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:21 pm

https://phys.org/news/2024-02-jwst-blac ... stars.html
Astronomers have long sought to understand the early universe, and thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), a critical piece of the puzzle has emerged. The telescope's infrared detecting "eyes" have spotted an array of small, red dots, identified as some of the earliest galaxies formed in the universe.

This surprising discovery is not just a visual marvel, it's a clue that could unlock the secrets of how galaxies and their enigmatic black holes began their cosmic journey.

"The astonishing discovery from James Webb is that not only does the universe have these very compact and infrared bright objects, but they're probably regions where huge black holes already exist," explains JILA Fellow and University of Colorado Boulder astrophysics professor Mitch Begelman. "That was thought to be impossible."

"Something new is needed to reconcile the theory of galaxy formation with the new data," elaborates Silk, the lead author of the potentially groundbreaking study.
So, it look like they will have to modify the model they’ve boasted about … for the thousandth time! Did they ever really have a model, folks? Was it the settle science that they claimed it was? Maybe the “something new” they’ve been missing lies in plasma cosmology, viewing the universe electrically, and perhaps MOND? Perhaps their pursuit of dark matter, dark energy, and even ubiquitous black holes has been a wild goose chase?
Thanks to the observations of the "little red dots" by the JWST, the researchers found that the first galaxies in the universe were brighter than expected, as many showed stars coexisting with central black holes known as quasars.
Or ... maybe mainstream physicists are fooling themselves once again? Maybe quasars aren’t black holes, but the plasmoids long described by plasma cosmologists? Unlike black holes, we know without a doubt that plasmoids exist. After all, they’ve been created and studied in earth based labs (unlike hypothetical black holes). They’re entities that emit jets like those observed from stars and galaxies (a phenomena that black hole theorists still struggle to adequately explain). And they are entities that can occur any time plasma carries electricity … and there is plenty of both plasma and electricity in the universe, isn't there?
Seeing the coexistence of stars with black holes, the researchers quickly realized that the conventional theories of galaxy formation had to be flawed.
A correction ... they are only "seeing" stars. They only think they coexist with HYPOTHETICAL black holes. But either way their long held theory that they assured everyone was settled science doesn’t appear to be settled at all. They are talking about going back to the drawing board here. So why don’t they go all the way back and reexamine their base assumptions … because maybe that is where the real problem lies? After so many fail predictions, good scientists would do that … but we all know that mainstream science is dead. Mainstream astrophysics is now a religion and these astrophysicists are the priests of that religion. All bow and believe whatever they claim. And don’t forget to tithe them … because that’s what modern astrophysics is really about.
To validate this new theory of collaborative galactic formation between the stars and black holes, and provide further insight into the processes involved, computer simulations are needed.
Ah yes … more of the type of computer simulations that have done them so much good so far. (sarcasm) Well I say garbage in will be garbage out ... once again. And who will pay for all these new simulations? You guessed it … NOT THEM.
"This will take some time," Begelman says. "The current computer simulations are rather primitive, and you need high resolution to understand everything. It takes a lot of computing power and is expensive."
Meaning that they are going to come begging for bigger and faster computers … which, as they admit, will be “EXPENSIVE”. But hey … it’s only money … taxpayer money … YOUR money. So reach into your pockets and cough it up. The priests demand it and seem to get whatever they want from a government can take your money for projects like this regardless of wishes or beliefs. Regardless of how both mainstream astrophysics AND government have failed us the past four decades. Don't you know you're supposed to worship mainstream astrophysics and the government? They demand it.

"As far as I know, we're the first to go in quite this extreme direction," adds Begelman. "I was kind of pushing the envelope over the years with my collaborators working on this black hole formation problem. But JWST shows us that we didn't think outside the box enough."

And you still aren’t, Begelman.

Just saying …

BeAChooser
Posts: 1082
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

And Another.

Unread post by BeAChooser » Mon Feb 26, 2024 12:06 am

More bad news for the mainstream astrophysics ...

https://www.space.com/ancient-galaxy-upending-cosmology
James Webb telescope finds ancient galaxy larger than our Milky Way, and it's threatening to upend cosmology

… snip …

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has found a galaxy in the early universe that's so massive, it shouldn't exist, posing a "significant challenge" to the standard model of cosmology, according to the study authors.

The galaxy, called ZF-UDS-7329, contains more stars than the Milky Way, despite having formed only 800 million years into the universe's 13.8 billion-year life span. This means they were somehow born without dark matter seeding their formation, contrary to what the standard model of galaxy formation suggests.

… snip …

"Having these extremely massive galaxies so early in the universe is posing significant challenges to our standard model of cosmology," study co-author Claudia Lagos, an associate professor of astronomy at the International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, said in a statement.

… snip …

Current theories suggest that halos of dark matter (a mysterious and invisible substance believed to make up 25% of the present universe) combined with gas to form the first seedlings of galaxies. After 1 billion to 2 billion years of the universe's life, the early protogalaxies then reached adolescence, forming into dwarf galaxies that began devouring one another to grow into ones like our own.

But the new discovery has confounded this view: Not only did the galaxy crystallize without enough built up dark matter to seed it, but not long after a sudden burst of star formation, the galaxy abruptly became quiescent — meaning its star formation ceased.
Here’s another article …

https://futurism.com/the-byte/impossibl ... james-webb
This hypothesized role of dark matter is a key part of the most widely accepted cosmological model. This new discovery, however, throws a wrench in the works.

… snip …

Of course, to rewrite cosmology as we know it, we're going to need more than a few outliers. Thanks to advanced telescopes like the James Webb, though, we're discovering more and more of these confounding, seemingly impossible cosmic oddities than ever before.
But I ask ... do we really need more than a few outliers to upend mainstream cosmology, when all that cosmology is based on are GNOMES for which there is still no actual proof after 50 years of looking? What’s really befuddling is why mainstream astrophysics are so tied to belief in gnomes rather than good scientific method. Oh … by the way … here’s the paper announcing this discovery …

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07191-9
The formation of galaxies by gradual hierarchical co-assembly of baryons and cold dark matter halos is a fundamental paradigm underpinning modern astrophysics[1, 2] and predicts a strong decline in the number of massive galaxies at early cosmic times[3–5]. Extremely massive quiescent galaxies (stellar masses > 1011M⊙) have now been observed as early as 1–2 billions years after the Big Bang[6–13]; these are extremely constraining on theoretical models as they form 300–500 Myr earlier and only some models can form massive galaxies this early [12, 14]. Here we report on the spectroscopic observations with the James Webb Space Telescope of a massive quiescent galaxy ZF-UDS-7329 at redshift 3.205 ± 0.005 that eluded deep ground-based spectrscopy[8], is significantly redder than typical and whose spectrum reveals features typical of much older stellar populations. Detailed modelling shows the stellar population formed around 1.5 billion years earlier in time (z ~ 11) at an epoch when dark matter halos of sufficient hosting mass have not yet assembled in the standard scenario[4, 5]. This observation may point to the presence of undetected populations of early galaxies and the possibility of significant gaps in our understanding of early stellar populations, galaxy formation and/or the nature of dark matter.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest