Shapiro gravitational time delay is also caused by refraction

[mariuslvasile]

'The Shapiro time delay effect, or gravitational time delay effect, is one of the four classic Solar System tests of general relativity. Radar signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present. The time delay is caused by time dilation, which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer.[...]

Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses c as the speed of light and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a Schwarzschild solution to the Einstein field equations.'- Wikipedia


And, just like Einstein, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, which require to take into consideration the index of refraction, which affects the speed of light and of radio waves (electro-magnetic waves in general), each time the wave enters a medium.

Which immediately shows that the radio wave will slow down when passing near a massive object, because of the atmosphere which surrounds the massive object, i.e. sun or planet, which causes the radio wave to refract and decrease its speed.

 So, just like in the case of gravitational redshift, einsteinian pseudo-physicists have confused an effect produced by refraction with one of gravitation. Which proves once more that general relativity is an absurd pseudo-science based on a complete ignorance of classical physics and refraction.


This is just another example of how refraction is confused with gravitation by these so called scientists, who don't know basic refraction physics. They just have to know that v=c/n, where n is index of refraction, which is learned in highschool, and do the math (altough they need to know the exact indexes of refraction of the sun and planets, which I dont think any of them knows, since they don't even know the basics of refraction). Instead they use c everywhere, instead of v=c/n, and illogically 'prove' that time is slowed down by gravity, as predicted by general relativity. But all they prove is Einstein's prediction that

'Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity'.


https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/0 ... n.html?m=1

[crawler]

'The Shapiro time delay effect, or gravitational time delay effect, is one of the four classic Solar System tests of general relativity. Radar signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present. The time delay is caused by time dilation, which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer.[...]

Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses c as the speed of light and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a Schwarzschild solution to the Einstein field equations.'- Wikipedia


And, just like Einstein, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, which require to take into consideration the index of refraction, which affects the speed of light and of radio waves (electro-magnetic waves in general), each time the wave enters a medium.

Which immediately shows that the radio wave will slow down when passing near a massive object, because of the atmosphere which surrounds the massive object, i.e. sun or planet, which causes the radio wave to refract and decrease its speed.

 So, just like in the case of gravitational redshift, einsteinian pseudo-physicists have confused an effect produced by refraction with one of gravitation. Which proves once more that general relativity is an absurd pseudo-science based on a complete ignorance of classical physics and refraction.


This is just another example of how refraction is confused with gravitation by these so called scientists, who don't know basic refraction physics. They just have to know that v=c/n, where n is index of refraction, which is learned in highschool, and do the math (altough they need to know the exact indexes of refraction of the sun and planets, which I dont think any of them knows, since they don't even know the basics of refraction). Instead they use c everywhere, instead of v=c/n, and illogically 'prove' that time is slowed down by gravity, as predicted by general relativity. But all they prove is Einstein's prediction that

'Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity'.


https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/0 ... n.html?m=1

Notice that Shapiro used radar, but wiki says that Shapiro shows that light is slowed.
Light (ie photons) is not radar (ie radio waves).
They are two different animals.
If they are slowed by the same amount (when passing the Sun) then that is an accident.
This accidental slowing equivalence applies to simple refractional slowing, & it also applies to photaeno congestion slowing (Shapiro Delay)(my own theory explaining Shapiro Delay).
But at this point i need to explain that refraction of all kinds & slowing of all kinds are caused by the same thing (my photaeno congestion).

No, wait, i am wrong, there is a slowing that is due to the aetherwind being a tailwind or a headwind or a crosswind or some combination. Which is additional to pure Shapiro Delay.
So, we have c, & we have c', & we have c' + V etc.

[mariuslvasile]

Notice that Shapiro used radar, but wiki says that Shapiro shows that light is slowed.
Light (ie photons) is not radar (ie radio waves).
They are two different animals.

Light waves and radio waves are both electro-magnetic waves, they are essentially the same thing but radio waves have much lower frequency/energy and much longer wavelength than visible light. So the most dangerous are the gamma rays, which have the highest frequency/energy and shortest wavelength, then X-rays, then ultraviolet, then visible light, then infrared, then micro-waves, then radio waves at the bottom of the electro-magnetic food chain.

And photons do not exist, they are just another abberation of Einstein who came up with the particle-wave dichotomy which is a non-sense and a contradiction in terms. I have proved that photons don't exist here, because they are logically and mathematically inconsistent:

https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2023/1 ... o.html?m=1

And if you think that aether is real and is the medium of propagation of light (and all EM waves), then the photon particle has no place in your theory, or in any aether based theory. Since Einstein removed the aether to make room for this photon particle which does not require a medium of propagation, and which simply denies the existence of aether. Because the photon is a particle which moves in a vacuum, like a projectile from point A to point B, not a wave which moves through an aether medium as a disturbance in the aether.
As Tesla remarked, Einstein was a meta-physicist and a curly haired crackpot, and most of his theories (except the energy-mass equivalence, which he stole from Poincare) were completely devoid of any physical meaning. And of logic, because they just dont make any sense.