Re: The Dark Moon
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 7:27 pm
I notice in the GoPro HERO4 Black photo EXIF data 'Flash(on, fired)'. WTF?
For discussion of Electric Universe and Plasma Cosmology. The ideas and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of T-Bolts Group Inc or The Thunderbolts Project™
http://thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/phpBB3/
http://thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=297
It's especially strange as the new space-rated camera body includes a new LED flesh on all modified GoPros onboard as shown in the video below. At first I thought it was just a software-remnant of the stock GoPros and just the flash bit was set and the actual LED removed. But that's not the case as the video reveals which means the flash was actually active.
Holger Isenberg wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 2:20 am The original image EXIF data is included about aperture setting, ISO equivalent, exposure time. But without the information about the IR/UV cutoff filter no quantitative analysis is possible about the light levels. Interesting to see how the EXIF flash active bit is set! The 10min video about the cameras on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xv_4fBDC3w also shows a LED light on each of them. Focal length for the GoPros visible there as well as 5.4mm which is similar to the 5mm of the original lens.
I read a couple of years ago about an effort to use AI to try and fill in some of the garbled or missing portions of the voice recordings. Over the years I have read just about everything on the missions, transcripts, crew experience reports, technical briefings and interviews with crew members. There are lots of unambiguous statements that clearly describe the utter blackness out there, that nothing other that the Earth and Moon were visible from cislunar space and I'll continue to believe them unless there is scientific proof otherwise.@Holger
A new website about Apollo audio transcriptions has been published, currently with 11, 13 and 17.
There are so many unknowns with the cameras themselves and the line of sight during the imaging that it is tough to determine just what is going on out there. We know that Venus was on the verge of visibility from the lunar surface, and that in the far UV the stars were visible, with sufficient exposure. This IMO is because of the nature of the lunar atmosphere, it is insufficient in density and/or composition for conversion to visible wavelengths to take place, but we know that Venus and Saturn emit strongly in the UVSaturn visible by GoPro! Flight day 4, Nov 19:
And what were the modifications? A UV passing lens? Although I don't see much sensitivity to UV of the sensor, a Lumigen product coating is a possibility, NASA has used them before, including on Hubble.'Each of Orion's four solar array wings has a commercial off-the-shelf camera mounted at the tip that has been highly modified for use in space.."
The idea that the world we experience is a kind of simulation is not new, and goes back at least to Plato, and Einstein also thought it so. Buckminster Fuller who was a friend of Einstein said the same thing, "life is but a dream". As to how we create the reality I don't know.
The diagonal bright streak over the Moon continuing outwards in both direction could be something outside, but there there is also chance for just lens reflections in this wide angle lens. An interesting lens effect is definitely the position change of the Moon in the video a few seconds later when the camera mode was changed. Saturn stays at exactly the same image location and also parts of the spacecraft which are still faintly visible. But the Moon change image location by about 2 lunar diameters. That can be explained by focus change, but if it was due to focus change why didn't Saturn move?GaryN wrote: ↑Tue Dec 13, 2022 8:39 pm It seems to be showing an equatorial ring too, which some people have claimed there is.
https://flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/ ... 303788800/
The other possibility is that it would be an orange line from Sodium, too faint to see but instrumentally detectable.
The first private lander is headed to the moon.
Oh'rly! what kind of display would that be. I at least immediately saw a vertial plasmoid-belt ring anyway. So if you flip 90deg it would probably display too correctly in the common view, and cause too many people to see it as well. But of course, who knows. it's all black everything in space.from over 1.2 million km away from Earth. The image has been rotated 90 degrees for display purposes
Black on dark background, interesting! Especially with that camera being 200 times more sensitive than the LROC NAC https://www.lroc.asu.edu/about which is a quite common CCD.
Can it map the CMB while it's out there? HAHAH LOL!the ShadowCam instrument points into deep space. Even in the absence of light, all camera sensors record varying amounts of background signal and noise