The Achilles heel of the LCDM model: Galaxy evolution over time.

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.
Michael Mozina
Posts: 2295
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:35 pm

The Achilles heel of the LCDM model: Galaxy evolution over time.

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:13 pm

Probably the only falsifiable aspect of the big bang model is it's core and unavoidable assumption of galaxy evolution over time.

LCDM proponents have 95 percent metaphysical fudge factor to work with, so they can do anything they want with the math. They can postdict a mathematical fit to nearly any and all observations. Nothing mathematical in nature is likely to bring down the LCDM model. The moment they decided to apply math to multiple mythical entities inside of a GR formula, the possibility of falsifying the LCDM model vanished immediately. Galaxy expansion doesn't slow down over time as first predicted in the big bang model? No problem. Just add 70 percent metaphysical dark energy nonsense, and the mathematical problem is solved.

On the other hand, the expansion interpretation of redshift leads LCDM proponents to imagine a hypothetical creation (of all physical matter) event. Once matter exists in a stable form it can "clump" to evolve into gas giants, stars and galaxies. This all implies an "evolutionary" galaxy creation process which should show significant signs of galaxy evolution over time.

As many of us in the EU community predicted, the distant universe looks pretty much exactly like our local universe. Early JWST images show massive and bright galaxies in the most distant parts of our universe, just like Hubble deep field images. JWST however has a much larger mirror and it can see 'redder' wavelengths than Hubble, so it can see even more distant galaxies.

The one unavoidable 'prediction' of the LCDM model is it's assumption of a nucleosynthesis (creation of matter) event, followed by galaxy evolution over time, yet thus far all the JWST evidence suggests exactly the opposite. The distant universe looks a lot like our local universe, and none of the mainstream galaxy evolution models predict what we observe in the distant, high redshift universe.

A 'static' (constantly moving) universe where redshift is caused by particle/field/quantum interactions in space, would simply assume the universe is ancient and eternal, and it essentially looks pretty much the same everywhere. So far, this core and unavoidable prediction of "tired light" theory is 100 percent consistent with JWST images of the most redshifted objects in space.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests