Reply to "Professor" Dave...
-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:02 am
Reply to "Professor" Dave...
New version of Carl Sagan on the loose....
https://youtu.be/KNTu_pqmq2E?list=TLPQM ... 8iN4kodxsA
My reply:
https://youtu.be/mV04rjp2udE
https://youtu.be/KNTu_pqmq2E?list=TLPQM ... 8iN4kodxsA
My reply:
https://youtu.be/mV04rjp2udE
- spark
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 2:36 pm
Re: Reply to "Professor" Dave...
Electric/Plasma Universe models will be accepted as being self-evident if everyone who is able to experiment, tried to create fractal galaxies and stars inside a vacuum chamber filled with various gases and metal vapors, and uploaded many videos about it on YouTube.
We need "Electric Galaxy in a Jar" videos similar to "Sonoluminescence/Star in a Jar" videos on YouTube.
Physicist Winston Bostick who first created galaxies inside vacuum chamber, would be awesome to see Winston Bostick's experiment replicated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtYVTGlHGAk
Also electrical engineer Eric Dollard who created galaxy and stars inside a burned-out lightbulb that acted as vacuum chamber with vaporized gases and metal vapors, he used multiple Tesla Coils out of phase and pointed at burned-out lightbulb: https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/ph ... f=11&t=195
Not even "Professor" Dave can reject Electric/Plasma Universe models then. Well, if he still rejected it, then he is no different than a flat earther rejecting all evidence of earth being a globe.
We need "Electric Galaxy in a Jar" videos similar to "Sonoluminescence/Star in a Jar" videos on YouTube.
Physicist Winston Bostick who first created galaxies inside vacuum chamber, would be awesome to see Winston Bostick's experiment replicated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtYVTGlHGAk
Also electrical engineer Eric Dollard who created galaxy and stars inside a burned-out lightbulb that acted as vacuum chamber with vaporized gases and metal vapors, he used multiple Tesla Coils out of phase and pointed at burned-out lightbulb: https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/ph ... f=11&t=195
Not even "Professor" Dave can reject Electric/Plasma Universe models then. Well, if he still rejected it, then he is no different than a flat earther rejecting all evidence of earth being a globe.
- spark
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 2:36 pm
Re: Reply to "Professor" Dave...
Also fractal solar system experiment: https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/ph ... f=11&t=726
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2021 9:24 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Reply to "Professor" Dave...
Right, or an Expanding Earther, or a Hollow Earther, or a Neon universer.
Let's just line everybody up to slap the FE guy in the front row...
If a Social Etiquette is needed see a clip of the movie Airplane; https://youtu.be/FNkpIDBtC2c?t=37
I take only minor offense, O fellow comrade poster.
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:10 am
Re: Reply to "Professor" Dave...
@BuckeyeFrank LOL "Social Etiquette", vigorously applied.
I think you and spark have highlighted an extremely important aspect of doing "science". There is an enormous difference between "refuting" and "rejecting". Dr. Eric Lerner has engaged in the comments sections of Herr Doktor Professor Brian Keating's related videos to specifically and calmly, point by point, refute Keating's assertions about Lerner's IAI article and videos. When Keating asserted there are no other models that predict the observed phenomena, I replied with the Electric Universe model. And got this response from Keating:
I think you and spark have highlighted an extremely important aspect of doing "science". There is an enormous difference between "refuting" and "rejecting". Dr. Eric Lerner has engaged in the comments sections of Herr Doktor Professor Brian Keating's related videos to specifically and calmly, point by point, refute Keating's assertions about Lerner's IAI article and videos. When Keating asserted there are no other models that predict the observed phenomena, I replied with the Electric Universe model. And got this response from Keating:
I offer this as an example of "rejecting", in that he makes the claim that the model is "unreliable" without a single example of a failed prediction. It's pretty obvious he has not bothered to investigate it. The other parts of his response are similarly deflection to wave away the galaxy size issue and imply those offering the tired light hypothesis are promoting "nonsense". As far as a flat earth is concerned, my impression is that its proponents have to stretch pretty far to support their hypothesis, and I wonder at their motivations, but just rejecting it out of hand because it's "weird" is wrong; refuting it with counter-arguments is science.Lol. The Electric Universe is more unreliable than electric power in California. Just curious are you or Eric even able to derive the basic formulas of electromagnetic plasma physics? If so, please demonstrate here. And with respect to the standard model please cite one formula that predicts galaxy sizes for JWST images in either the Big Bang or Lerner’s tired light nonsense.
Time is what prevents everything from happening all at once.
- nick c
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:12 am
Re: Reply to "Professor" Dave...
Forum member Michael Mozina posted this a couple of years ago:
Reply to Prof Dave Farina
Reply to Prof Dave Farina
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests