Speaking of wasting money …

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light? If you have a personal favorite theory, that is in someway related to the Electric Universe, this is where it can be posted.
BeAChooser
Posts: 1112
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Speaking of wasting money …

Unread post by BeAChooser » Mon May 06, 2024 5:33 am

Now this is interesting …

https://scitechdaily.com/fusion-breakth ... n-degrees/
In the nine decades since humans first produced fusion reactions, only a few fusion technologies have demonstrated the ability to make a thermal fusion plasma with electron temperatures hotter than 10 million degrees Celsius, roughly the temperature of the core of the sun. Zap Energy’s unique approach, known as a sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch, has now joined those rarefied ranks, far exceeding this plasma temperature milestone in a device that is a fraction of the scale of other fusion systems.

… snip …

A new research paper, published this month in Physical Review Letters, details measurements made on Zap Energy’s Fusion Z-pinch Experiment (FuZE) of 1-3 keV plasma electron temperatures — roughly the equivalent of 11 to 37 million degrees Celsius (20 to 66 million degrees Fahrenheit). FuZE is the simplest, smallest, and lowest cost device to have achieved it.

… snip …

Zap Energy’s technology is based on a simple plasma confinement scheme known as a Z pinch, where large electric currents are channeled through a thin filament of plasma. The conducting plasma generates its own electromagnetic fields, which both heats and compresses it. While Z-pinch fusion has been experimented with since the 1950’s, the approach has largely been stymied by how short-lived its plasmas are, a problem Zap has solved by applying a dynamic flow through the plasma, a process called sheared-flow stabilization.
No, I'd hazard it was stymied by lack of funding because it was a threat to the Big Boys.
“The dynamics are a wonderful balancing act of plasma physics,” explains Levitt. “As we climb to higher and higher plasma currents, we optimize the sweet spot where the temperature, density, and lifetime of the Z pinch align to form a stable, high-performance fusing plasma.”

A healthy pinch

Fusion researchers measure plasma temperatures in units of electron-volts and can measure the temperature of the plasma’s ions (nuclei) and electrons separately. Since the ions are more than a thousand-fold heavier than the electrons, the two components of the plasma can heat and cool at different rates. Since the ions are what ultimately need to be heated to fusion temperatures, plasma physicists often worry about situations where cold electrons limit ion heating, like ice cubes in a hot soup. The electrons in the FuZE plasma, however, were shown to be as hot as the ions, indicating that the plasma is in a healthy thermal equilibrium.

Further, Zap’s detailed measurements show that electron temperatures and fusion neutron production peak simultaneously. As neutrons are a primary product of the fusing ions, these observations support the idea of a fusing plasma in thermal equilibrium.

“The results in this paper and further tests we’ve done since, all paint a good overall picture of a fusion plasma with room to scale toward energy gain,” says Uri Shumlak, co-founder and Chief Scientist at Zap Energy. “Working at higher currents we’re still seeing sheared flow extending the Z-pinch lifetimes long enough to produce very high temperatures and the associated neutron yields we’d predict from modeling.”

… snip …

Unlike the two mainstream fusion approaches that have been the focus of the majority of fusion research in recent decades, Zap’s technology does not require expensive and complex superconducting magnets or powerful lasers. “Zap tech is orders of magnitude less expensive and quicker to build than other devices, allowing us to iterate rapidly and produce the cheapest thermal fusion neutrons out there. Compelling innovation economics are vital to launching a commercial fusion product on a timescale that matters,” said Benj Conway, CEO and co-founder of Zap.

In 2022, the same time these results from FuZE were collected, Zap commissioned its next-generation device FuZE-Q. While early results from FuZE-Q are still forthcoming, the device has a power bank with ten times the stored energy as FuZE and capacity to scale to much higher temperatures and densities. Meanwhile, parallel development of power plant systems is also underway.
Now, just to entice, up till now Zap Energy was doing testing at 500 kA. Its next-generation FuZE-Q is designed for 650 kA because the team’s modeling predicts Q=1 (breakeven) around 650 kA of current. So stay tuned. BUT, Zap Energy plans to use tritium as its fuel. That’s a BIG problem since FuZE doesn't appear to offer a path to creating more. Stay tuned.

BeAChooser
Posts: 1112
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Speaking of wasting money …

Unread post by BeAChooser » Sun May 12, 2024 10:44 pm

https://www.newarkadvertiser.co.uk/news ... p-9365711/
Bidding to begin building the world’s first nuclear fusion energy plant in Nottinghamshire will begin within weeks.

The pioneering work at the decommissioned West Burton A power station near Retford will be constructed by 2040, using the same clean energy process which powers the sun.

The Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP) could produce large amounts of clean energy and reduce reliance on oil and gas.
The bidding process to find a company to handle construction and another to handle engineering – collectively worth around £600m – will formally open on May 22.
Notice? They’re spending three-quarters of a BILLON tax dollars on a “could”.

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/taxpayers-fu ... 49880.html
Pioneering nuclear fusion power plants are to be fast tracked through the planning process and supported with taxpayer money as Britain attempts to become a world leader in the technology.

Under new proposals by the Government, commercial fusion reactors will be exempt from the usual planning rules governing nuclear power stations.
Why isn’t that just peachy!

And …
Sir Ian Chapman, chief executive of the UK Atomic Energy Authority, the taxpayer-backed body which will fund and oversee the project, said costs for the new reactor, called Step, were uncertain but suggested it would be in the low billions of pounds.
So it’s probably not just 750 million dollars that will be spent on this first of a kind reactor EXPERIMENT but several billion dollars … all based on wishful thinking. But at least the UK is smart enough to stop throwing money at ITER …

https://financialpost.com/pmn/business- ... without-uk
World’s Biggest Nuclear-Fusion Project Plans to Reset Without UK
And no wonder …
TER was originally scheduled to cost about $5 billion and begin testing in 2020. The budget has ballooned past $22 billion, with no date set for trials. The dizzyingly complex machine being built in southern France pieces together more than a million parts sourced from around the world, with even the slightest anomalies causing months or years of delay. 
Just saying ...

BeAChooser
Posts: 1112
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Speaking of wasting money …

Unread post by BeAChooser » Fri May 17, 2024 2:59 am

https://centraljersey.com/2024/05/16/a- ... -making-2/
‘This is magic’

Ground has officially broken for the Princeton Plasma Innovation Center (PPIC), a new laboratory facility at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL).

The PPPL, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national research laboratory, is managed by Princeton University and has had a focus on fusion energy.

… snip …

The PPPL construction of the new PPIC costs close to $110 million and is expected to be completed in 2027.
My question is why do they need these fancy new digs? After all, scads of government and partially government-funded *private* fusion projects are predicting they will have working fusion reactors long before this new PPPL facility can learn anything to help them do it. A few of those projects have already broken ground on their first fusion power plants (i.e., facilities that they claim will produce significantly more electricity than they use). In fact, here’s a Newsweek article (https://www.newsweek.com/nuclear-fusion ... gy-1773349 ) that tells the public that “some nuclear fusion reactors will be fully operational by 2027.”

The Biden Whitehouse itself announced in March of 2022 that they hoped to build a pilot plant by 2032. Troy Carter, a plasma physicist at UCLA, announced that was feasible. In May of 2023, Microsoft announced a commitment to buy 50 megawatts of electricity from Helion Energy in 2028. Live Science published an article in 2020 (https://www.livescience.com/nuclear-fus ... -2025.html) about seven studies that suggest “A viable nuclear fusion reactor — one that spits out more energy than it consumes — could be here as soon as 2025." And the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has laid out a timeline for a US fusion pilot plant that would begin producing energy in the 2035 time frame. They call for public-private efforts to produce by 2028 a pilot plant design.

If the fusion industry is already designing or building pilot plants in 2028, what in the world will Princeton do with their shiny new facility when it opens in 2027 (which it likely won’t because almost any project these days gets delayed). Again, why does Princeton need these new digs when they're going to be late to the ball game? Perhaps because they know they won't be? ;)

What’s really funny is that the "This is magic" article touts the facility’s “green”ness … boasting about a green roof garden, energy efficient lighting, etc. etc. Why in the world do they need to worry about those things if we’re going to have the promised unlimited, carbon-free, fusion energy in the early 2030s? Just saying ... :D

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest