https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/sc ... r-BB1jDvRg
But the article admits …Scientists make shocking claim dark matter may really be an alternate shadow universe
… snip …
The new paper by Dr. Arushi Bodas, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Chicago’s Enrico Fermi Institute, and his colleagues, states that dark matter could and possibly should be viewed as a distorted alternate universe that never fully developed.
Why? Because …But before discussing the paper, it’s important to understand just how mysterious dark matter really is.
That's easier said than done, however
Then it claims …Despite it constituting more than 80 percent of all matter in the universe, scientists have yet to observe dark matter, Its existence is inferred because the behavior of stars, planets, and galaxies would be wholly inexplicable without its presence.
Dark matter is difficult to observe; in fact, it’s completely imperceptible. It emits zero light or energy, making it undetectable by conventional sensors and detectors.
Scientists believe its composition is the key to understanding its mysterious nature. Visible matter, also known as baryonic matter, is composed of subatomic particles called baryons, which consist of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The composition of dark matter, on the other hand, remains speculative.
The problem here is that there are at least 2 other explanation for their rotation curve evidence … neither of which requires dark matter. One (MOND) is speculative, but doesn't require any new speculative particles or forces or dimensions, just a simple change in the laws of gravity. The second (Plasma Cosmology) relies on known physics about plasma and electromagnetism which have been demonstrated in Earth based labs and successfully used in state of the art computer programs by plasma cosmologists to explain those rotation curves. But like every MSM article has done to date, this one completely ignores that work. In other words, the public is not being informed but propagandized … because there too much money and too many careers at stake.Although a minority of scientists reject the idea of dark matter, there is now a plethora of evidence supporting its existence, with one of the most straightforward explanations involving the rotation of galaxies.
The last sentence of the article ...
is laughable, because Dr Bodas did not solidify anything. In fact, he merely regurgitates the party line that the mainstream has been pushing on the public since the idea of dark matter surfaced. A party line that, as I explained above, is questionable given the alternative explanations and the failure over the past half century to find non-inferential evidence that dark matter exists. Just saying ...The new paper by Dr. Bodas and his colleagues is just the latest to solidify the "dark matter really does exist' thesis.