NIH Adopts Journal Censorship

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.
jackokie
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:10 am

NIH Adopts Journal Censorship

Unread post by jackokie » Fri Oct 21, 2022 4:49 pm

The NIH emulates consensus astrophysicists.

https://www.city-journal.org/nih-blocks ... s-database

The article begins:
A policy of deliberate ignorance has corrupted top scientific institutions in the West. It’s been an open secret for years that prestigious journals will often reject submissions that offend prevailing political orthodoxies—especially if they involve controversial aspects of human biology and behavior—no matter how scientifically sound the work might be. The leading journal Nature Human Behaviour recently made this practice official in an editorial effectively announcing that it will not publish studies that show the wrong kind of differences between human groups.
Time is what prevents everything from happening all at once.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest