Quantum Entanglement

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.
steve
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:45 pm

Quantum Entanglement

Unread post by steve » Tue Apr 14, 2020 11:41 am

In 1934 Albert Einstein was investigating quantum theory, when he made a discovery he did not want to make.

He was working with two other physicists, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen. At first they assumed that they had found an error in the calculations, they had discovered that in certain conditions two electrons can bind together in such a way that they effectively become the same particle, even if they are separated by a large distance. This means that anything that happens to one particle instantly affects the other one.

Einstein referred to this as ‘spooky action at a distance’. This discovery, that two particles can resonate instantaneously however far apart they are, even if they are on opposite sides of the solar system, went against Einstein’s claim that nothing can travel faster that light.

At that time Albert Einstein was the most famous scientist in the world. He responded with his own theory that these particles must have somehow have been able to anticipate what was going to happen in advance.

Recent experiments have now shown that Neils Bohr’s Quantum calculations give a more accurate result than Einstein’s, and that the quantum calculations of Neils Bohr are correct. This effect is currently referred to as ‘quantum entanglement’ and is being used experimentally in the latest computer research.

crawler
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: Quantum Entanglement

Unread post by crawler » Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:26 pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox
It all smells like a golf-gedanken tween Einstein & Bohr, played over the phone, each imagining their strokes & putts on each hole, each knowing their own golf abilities, & no cheating allowed.
STR is krapp -- & GTR is mostly krapp.
The present Einsteinian Dark Age of science will soon end – for the times they are a-changin'.
The aether will return – it never left.

User avatar
paladin17
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Quantum Entanglement

Unread post by paladin17 » Thu Apr 16, 2020 3:17 pm

steve wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 11:41 am This discovery, that two particles can resonate instantaneously however far apart they are, even if they are on opposite sides of the solar system, went against Einstein’s claim that nothing can travel faster that light.
Except it didn't. Since quantum teleportation doesn't transfer (on its own) any mass, energy or information.

User avatar
EtherQuestions
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:54 pm

Re: Quantum Entanglement

Unread post by EtherQuestions » Thu May 21, 2020 10:06 pm

crawler wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:26 pm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox
It all smells like a golf-gedanken tween Einstein & Bohr, played over the phone, each imagining their strokes & putts on each hole, each knowing their own golf abilities, & no cheating allowed.
Your comments on Einstein are the best crawler, this one had me laughing for some time. :lol:

The EPR_paradox is a ridiculous debate between the biggest nonsense theories (and their idols) of Physics in the 20th Century.

Einstein hated non-determinism and invented a light-clock (his only real invention) to disprove it, but Bohr used Einstein's own GR Theory to refute it. It was just a back and forth between garbage theory built on garbage assumptions. "Junk in, junk out."
"Considering there is no reactive force even considered in the interaction between mass and space in General Relativity's space-curvature field equations, even though both can likewise act on one another, it is therefore in direct violation of Newton's 3rd Law of Motion."

crawler
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: Quantum Entanglement

Unread post by crawler » Fri May 22, 2020 1:19 am

EtherQuestions wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 10:06 pm
crawler wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:26 pm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox
It all smells like a golf-gedanken tween Einstein & Bohr, played over the phone, each imagining their strokes & putts on each hole, each knowing their own golf abilities, & no cheating allowed.
Your comments on Einstein are the best crawler, this one had me laughing for some time. :lol:

The EPR_paradox is a ridiculous debate between the biggest nonsense theories (and their idols) of Physics in the 20th Century.

Einstein hated non-determinism and invented a light-clock (his only real invention) to disprove it, but Bohr used Einstein's own GR Theory to refute it. It was just a back and forth between garbage theory built on garbage assumptions. "Junk in, junk out."
Anyhow, the game was even after 17 holes, & on the 18th Bohr holed a gedanken 5 iron for an eagle, but Einstein pulled the genanken ball out of the gedanken cup & announced that Bohr had hit the wrong ball.
STR is krapp -- & GTR is mostly krapp.
The present Einsteinian Dark Age of science will soon end – for the times they are a-changin'.
The aether will return – it never left.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest