An Editor of Scientific America..

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.
Forum rules
Post Reply
Cargo
Posts: 663
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:02 am

An Editor of Scientific America..

Unread post by Cargo » Mon Dec 26, 2022 7:37 am

Absolutely roasting, I wish and think actually, it should be this easy with gravity and electric spaces/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/tanya-lewis/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D9sya2cUR4

Now, the only reason I would bring this here, is well, we are talking about scientificamerican.com
https://www.scientificamerican.com/page ... -american/

As if "peer review" hasn't already been totally destroyed, let's add this to the list of derelicts from the pre-EU paradigm shift.
interstellar filaments conducted electricity having currents as high as 10 thousand billion amperes
"You know not what. .. Perhaps you no longer trust your feelings,." Michael Clarage
"Charge separation prevents the collapse of stars." Wal Thornhill
Top
jackokie
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:10 am

Re: An Editor of Scientific America..

Unread post by jackokie » Wed Jan 18, 2023 11:59 pm

Next, SA will announce they are replacing their current editors with the ladies from The View.
Time is what prevents everything from happening all at once.
Top
BeAChooser
Posts: 948
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: An Editor of Scientific America..

Unread post by BeAChooser » Thu Jan 19, 2023 12:24 am

SA has been corrupted by wokeness. But we're not supposed to talk about that.

Science is Dead.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The Future of Science”