An Editor of Scientific America..

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.
Posts: 666
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:02 am

An Editor of Scientific America..

Unread post by Cargo » Mon Dec 26, 2022 7:37 am

Absolutely roasting, I wish and think actually, it should be this easy with gravity and electric spaces/

Now, the only reason I would bring this here, is well, we are talking about ... -american/

As if "peer review" hasn't already been totally destroyed, let's add this to the list of derelicts from the pre-EU paradigm shift.
interstellar filaments conducted electricity having currents as high as 10 thousand billion amperes
"You know not what. .. Perhaps you no longer trust your feelings,." Michael Clarage
"Charge separation prevents the collapse of stars." Wal Thornhill

Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:10 am

Re: An Editor of Scientific America..

Unread post by jackokie » Wed Jan 18, 2023 11:59 pm

Next, SA will announce they are replacing their current editors with the ladies from The View.
Time is what prevents everything from happening all at once.

Posts: 948
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: An Editor of Scientific America..

Unread post by BeAChooser » Thu Jan 19, 2023 12:24 am

SA has been corrupted by wokeness. But we're not supposed to talk about that.

Science is Dead.

Post Reply