je-ne-sais-quoi

[BeAChooser]

Gizmodo's *science communicator* explains one of mainstream cosmologies greatest kludges to the public …

https://news.yahoo.com/over-billion-gal ... 00180.html

Dark energy is the je-ne-sais-quoi to which scientists ascribe the universe’s accelerating expansion.

Here’s how dictionaries define je-ne-sais-quoi …

A pleasing or attractive quality or attribute that is difficult to describe or express.

An intangible quality that makes something distinctive or attractive.

Something indescribable.

In fact the term literally means “I don’t know what” in French.

How that’s for *science* *reporting*?

[BeAChooser]

And if that isn’t scary enough … try this from Big Bang defending *science Communicator* Paul Sutter …

https://www.livescience.com/dark-energy ... h-suggests

Dark energy could lead to a second (and third, and fourth) Big Bang, new research suggests

One can only laugh at his *science* article, which ends with “Humans are not necessarily destined to live in a cold, empty cosmos, because dark energy might behave differently in the far future. Only continued research will uncover our ultimate fate.”

His purpose is clear. To sell more research into nonsense ... nonsense that is a complete waste of money by both the researchers and the reporters. How is ANY of this going to improve anyone’s life except the folks grifting off society to do this? Always remember, folks … they are wasting YOUR money. Maybe it's time we put a stop to that sort of thing, don’t you think?